Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated

Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com> Thu, 29 July 2021 22:05 UTC

Return-Path: <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A073A07D6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dkaHNoGF83qf for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3889A3A07D3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 15:04:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [86.85.149.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx3.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 275DB6A020; Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:04:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from plato ([86.85.149.247]) by imap.open-xchange.com with ESMTPSA id oq6hCAYmA2FXWgAA3c6Kzw (envelope-from <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>); Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:04:54 +0200
Message-ID: <60053e9139edce18b0cad62869dbd7c556fa1f34.camel@powerdns.com>
From: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>
To: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:04:53 +0200
In-Reply-To: <651ea536-3302-14f0-acd4-759a8d535d16@NLnetLabs.nl>
References: <0000061c-6125-3abf-4338-3163532624b0@NLnetLabs.nl> <b9af7b62d0fd1697eb8988d4edc5ef7284e28957.camel@powerdns.com> <CAHPuVdVujTY-4cKA3dc=b3TBprs6+w4hfcQUUwbB5eORcm6KKg@mail.gmail.com> <CAHPuVdUdU54f7nKjPdAGRo_XE9K6Cu7iUAjhbLHLWz+eVAbDsw@mail.gmail.com> <651ea536-3302-14f0-acd4-759a8d535d16@NLnetLabs.nl>
Organization: PowerDNS.COM B.V.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Tlth5zBEf2N1AIsYrrlpttMthwk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] IETF 111 DNSOP WG session II agenda updated
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 22:05:01 -0000

Hi Benno,

On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 23:48 +0200, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> As a follow up to Shumon's email, the order is indeed different than 
> usual.  Normally we schedule current business first, but for 
> agenda-technical reasons (allowing discussion) we have changed the order.
> 
> Hope you understand the exception to the rule.

Right, that argument works both ways, of course.

Option 1: schedule the draft at the end and promise to get to it 10
minutes before the end - in other words, hope that you can manage to
cut the priority discussion short.

Option 2 (chosen here): get the draft out of the way first and hope
that we manage to limit discussion time on it, to leave time for the
wider WG discussion on priorities.

It is understood. Thank you.

Kind regards,
-- 
Peter van Dijk
PowerDNS.COM BV - https://www.powerdns.com/