IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any - why not NOTIMP?

Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org> Mon, 07 August 2017 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <edward.lewis@icann.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706441321DE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:14:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LTXJ32HpEPUh for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AECB1323A0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:14:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:14:11 -0700
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Mon, 7 Aug 2017 09:14:11 -0700
From: Edward Lewis <edward.lewis@icann.org>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>, Ólafur Guðmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>
CC: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Ext] Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any - why not NOTIMP?
Thread-Index: AQHTD5QVkEOHh8Kk70ulhqhinKYjfKJ5fqoA///E4IA=
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:14:11 +0000
Message-ID: <19BAB7E0-4132-448C-92C5-BEC0441EF08F@icann.org>
References: <6c97191d-9591-d7de-6e8b-ed6e460c7707@bellis.me.uk> <CAN6NTqwXnZB_1nCn5nyg+TFSkh2dT=niZWAYg8wA2Tfe-ebWqA@mail.gmail.com> <af6270f2-d0c1-b027-0043-649a7945981b@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <af6270f2-d0c1-b027-0043-649a7945981b@bellis.me.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.24.1.170721
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [192.0.47.234]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="B_3584952851_1294082972"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/TyrWnJVWHP6yz1U4CAOQFE3n9GA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] Re: draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any - why not NOTIMP?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 16:14:16 -0000

On 8/7/17, 11:45, "DNSOP on behalf of Ray Bellis" <dnsop-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:

>    On 07/08/2017 16:44, Ólafur Guðmundsson wrote:
>    
>    > This was the original proposal, 
>    > the drawback is that resolvers to not cache the answer, and to make
>    > things worse they ask ALL NS addresses for listed domain 
>    > thus it acts as a DDoS against the domain in question.  
>    
>    Indeed - I've since confirmed that BIND does this.
>  
>    I think my point still stands that this behaviour should be documented
>    in the section that talks about a possible new RCODE and why that option
>    was rejected.

This thread is why I'd like to return "what the querier should do next" instead of "why I didn't answer". ;)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email