IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Wed, 06 November 2019 14:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC131208B0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:38:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=portfast.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPG2Qei6ASFE for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.portfast.net (mail.portfast.net [IPv6:2a03:9800:20:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D68521200F9 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 06:38:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=portfast.net; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=I7mYZkQKYVdiFcxplRJx0iPkPiRKC47yRrLbw84cUB4=; b=QxDYiI9WW+/dWea2Rg9PoifTiy IGlMlp3B187s/z7eXvEycYBOFdEW7N85+2c9GqkbBP4+1Jus/5nERFFGqrOt7sCH1qwqVNRb458aT k48k/V3pzdht7PtLSWoTyzFjLB1e9nG7U6D96lqpXKKuBVGxEbNEVZ9CGOiu6VsqHs/4=;
Received: from 88-212-170-135.customer.gigaclear.net ([88.212.170.135]:49990 helo=Rays-MacBook-Pro.local) by mail.portfast.net ([188.246.200.9]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1iSMRe-0008Dn-LC (Exim 4.89) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 14:38:02 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <157289952539.13851.12121504796430856747@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAAiTEH_t9Tsa_9go4JA=ELED7WcKzuPmCd_qD9nh+Vmicd0GQg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <9f5d6e35-cc67-3057-8db9-3eae40598ace@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 14:38:01 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAiTEH_t9Tsa_9go4JA=ELED7WcKzuPmCd_qD9nh+Vmicd0GQg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/U-ll--pNBCNKd2Ac8upFiYBEk1M>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-no-response-issue-14.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 14:38:07 -0000


On 06/11/2019 13:42, Matthew Pounsett wrote:
> I still have a few comments.  There were a few comments from my review 
> of -13 that weren't responded to in email, and haven't been updated in 
> the text, so I'm repeating them here.

Hi Matt,

We sought advice from one of the Chairs as to whether in his reading 
such a significant restructuring of the document was warranted when only 
one participant was calling for it.

We have not yet had a clear steer on that.

kind regards,

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email