IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 17 November 2010 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D870A3A68B8 for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:25:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.081
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.081 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.168, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PDTn9jWF4zNB for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:25:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:660:3003:2::4:11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46293A68A8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:25:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 8160F1C012D; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:26:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay2.nic.fr (relay2.nic.fr [192.134.4.163]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4B71C012C; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:26:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5BF7B0037; Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:26:30 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:26:30 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Message-ID: <20101117092630.GC30093@nic.fr>
References: <4CE0F829.1010605@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <7F03C666-16F8-49E4-BC56-F5DD441DD970@frobbit.se> <4CE1A110.1060403@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> <20101115213532.GD322@shinkuro.com> <04856F66-598D-43CC-8164-90178A6F2952@virtualized.org> <4CE283DA.5080606@abenaki.wabanaki.net> <20101116145308.GG1389@shinkuro.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011161601450.14239@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <8735DD8C-8992-45F4-B436-89AB9FA1B8E0@virtualized.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011161617150.14239@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1011161617150.14239@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux squeeze/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-liman-tld-names-04
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:25:46 -0000

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:02:41PM +0000,
 Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote 
 a message of 43 lines which said:

> I read it as a statement of the then-current TLD allocation policy,
> not the host name syntax, and an explanation of why the full
> syntactic check will not lead to ambiguity.

I fully agree and this is why I think that the traditional-tld-label
rule in draft-liman-tld-names-04 is a NEW rule, not a clarification.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email