IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 06 July 2018 16:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06512130E86 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zo82zlUEnTmr for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9132131053 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 09:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:46088) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) id 1fbTuZ-000FCu-Ls (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:48:47 +0100
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 17:48:47 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org, paul@redbarn.org
In-Reply-To: <20180706163316.6E98528E7D03@ary.qy>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1807061744030.916@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <20180706163316.6E98528E7D03@ary.qy>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UIFovEX-WlGoPJ305ZNg9WoXiSA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] abandoning ANAME and standardizing CNAME at apex
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 16:48:53 -0000

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
>
> You're probably right, but I think that ANAME would need as many
> upgrades, just in slightly different places.

ANAME should work without upgrades, because A and AAAA queries will get
the answers they expect. ANAME support is just a performance optimization
when the ANAME target is going geodns tricks.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Lundy, Fastnet: Variable mainly west 3 or 4. Slight. Fog patches developing.
Moderate or good, occasionally very poor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email