Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-05.txt

Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com> Wed, 06 January 2016 10:40 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Sara Dickinson <sara@sinodun.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160106103419.32661.38539.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 10:40:43 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B528EB6A-87FD-4BE5-A06F-E4157572C87E@sinodun.com>
References: <20160106103419.32661.38539.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UWzUcYWKF7S5UmSTiWtlFiPYKAU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-05.txt
Precedence: list

> On 6 Jan 2016, at 10:34, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : The edns-tcp-keepalive EDNS0 Option
>        Authors         : Paul Wouters
>                          Joe Abley
>                          Sara Dickinson
>                          Ray Bellis
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-keepalive-05.txt
> 	Pages           : 13
> 	Date            : 2016-01-06
> 

All, 

This version addresses most of the Gen-ART, OPS-DIR and other comments to date. Some minor issues remain to be agreed.

Changes vs -04 version:

   Reword Abstract and paragraph 9 in Introduction to remove discussion
   on balancing UDP/TCP and talk about encouraging use of long-lived TCP
   sessions.

   Section 3.2.2: should -> SHOULD

   Changed draft-ietf-dnsop-5966bis to be a normative reference,
   therefore adding a dependancy on publication of that as RFC.

   Reword sentence referring to RFC6824 since it is informational.

   Update IANA option to Standard.

   Remove last sentence from 1st paragraph of introduction.

   Reword paragraph 6 in Introduction, merge paragraph 7 and 8.

   Reword Section 3, first sentence to clarify the timeout is specified
   by the server.

   Correct missing URIs in 2 references.

   Clarify statement in Section 3.2.2 as how clients should handle
   updating the timeout when receiving a response.

   Reworded first paragraph of Introduction discussing TCP vs (UDP +
   retry over TCP).  Changed 'fallback' to 'retry' in 2 places.

Regards

Sara.

[DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp-kee… internet-drafts
Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-edns-tcp… Sara Dickinson