IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] .arpa

Richard Lamb <slamb@xtcn.com> Mon, 27 March 2017 00:12 UTC

Return-Path: <naticklamb@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EF2128796 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ygIb3Led6B7n for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50E03128990 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 190so36329191itm.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=xF3WVSVxw/ntSjT2r9U2ozCN3KCTpDhlj4MDgo3ij8A=; b=eUj41iNZs9LcJ0Jub4OIUXje0eNGEPM5dcFgowxqgZyF4PWaujXKCIcfrjLzwh0XZr QRRdig4kwVFDSdpjtsQSnQzpCQ/+hUzQ0WRchzn1Td/XoFaCbQFgM4zMc6J4DYmqQJoQ g21cJAEp1w++FXJrDagT7gm2adCYqCIEp/TdP/HBF6ecPrvIbX/X4FWHP1bDOkYm71vg BKVAYaoFVAsgjCqqLbJmUiqmSMEYCaScIG6WXmdsNxwaermY1Jw8ZcZT8xH/yuG0B5MO pItK3lWhngpOGpkZreAXSKc4wBefslNwNZcqDQNNE3T9fb3bYzZGFjHB2Y4eiexXR9Oq fjyw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xF3WVSVxw/ntSjT2r9U2ozCN3KCTpDhlj4MDgo3ij8A=; b=LhPpEoPwgiKii6TYuzMOXadyDmZOHoCsaljxTsiWhs+pOYrQhad3IrCJFqNkTBrqkj XUubNDUXOWnB1OfScuJuxwAZPHTWGAjcVts+wIJnfTY+CvkFYiHc7mBUpSxO7iAiJXrz cuqMDynvG7BMioE+jd6l5FxLt6jBvep99IYlCViJaAM05D8xNfEmKm8In98OJpSUq2UH 6HwvJmTiBmYk/RWmLPCTTENOeFarVuBNLeC2dpl6DnIOmSZo61JD3ba1Tnm9yZYIYMjq b0NNvqllHU7OYur/EDJwXoeEEUGF/HmKvz+d2UhAiKK8MAGhYeqgCvTGK2E2gMtekn8Q N83A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2FH6uOSRpUJpRMbkKsq+nrh0E/97VcF3EexnnDi73pp0iJU/5DwN1O9je80UsgnPTenudoqZ9D8Xanrw==
X-Received: by 10.36.94.206 with SMTP id h197mr7113369itb.27.1490573536716; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: naticklamb@gmail.com
Received: by 10.79.147.155 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <bfea867e81fc4147be39b424f6e3201f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org>
References: <E07AFAEB-2B84-4610-87E7-94CF32CF3761@fugue.com> <7652B138-FEAB-4138-91FB-D71AFE6BEF2C@vigilsec.com> <6DCFBC9D-666A-4A3C-A418-82BB6AE3D25D@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703210928390.28925@bofh.nohats.ca> <m1cqKPa-0000FeC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <71F88034-72C5-4AEE-9ACE-3493A1173634@gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.20.999.1703211011170.30281@bofh.nohats.ca> <0A544BEC-F719-4A7B-99E4-DC878EBE7B0C@gmail.com> <bfea867e81fc4147be39b424f6e3201f@PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org>
From: Richard Lamb <slamb@xtcn.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 17:12:16 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WhM8yG1omOZ9zuiM3C4UwSzz22Q
Message-ID: <CALXbJH_Ck38PUPJQ1QktohMkj81J+dBmo9DgfOWvfx9+D6cBOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Cc: "suzworldwide@gmail.com" <suzworldwide@gmail.com>, IETF dnsop Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1142523c2aef02054bab32ce
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/U_n1RG8wB6Yf62j320uaM1h4ky4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] .arpa
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 00:12:24 -0000

 +1 to all from  frmr usgovie.  We ain't that clever.



On Wednesday, March 22, 2017, Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> wrote:

>
> > On 21 Mar 2017, at 14:53, Suzanne Woolf <suzworldwide@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > RFC 3172 was written in 2001…
>
> RFC 3172 was an attempt to rewrite history and contrive an acronym:
> Address and Routing Parameter Area - really?
>
> > Respectfully, I’ve always wondered who has this problem (US or non-US)
> besides network infrastructure geeks Of a Certain Age (yes, including
> myself, and many IETF participants).
>
> It's a convenient tool for those hostile to USG "control" of the Internet:
> ie the US military is responsible for everything under .arpa, the US
> military's ARPA has still got some special status in the
> operation/development/control of the Internet, etc, etc. [And say things
> like "if .arpa isn't for US military control, why can't the string be
> changed?" or ".arpa hasn't been renamed since the Internet started 25-30
> years ago. That proves ARPA/DoD is in charge of the Internet.".] It's utter
> nonsense of course. But that doesn't stop government officials and
> policymakers from making these arguments. I have seen them do this many
> times. Sigh. RFC3172 didn't make things better.
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org <javascript:;>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>

v2.8.10 | Report a Bug | By Email