Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10.txt

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 30 September 2019 23:06 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E3412008F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VT023XPs_Gh7 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4DF120077 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BE40B20A06; Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <156962713660.24718.71133858140531907@ietfa.amsl.com> <CEC273B9-3EE4-4DEB-BA38-FCF90819C0AF@dukhovni.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 16:06:38 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CEC273B9-3EE4-4DEB-BA38-FCF90819C0AF@dukhovni.org> (Viktor Dukhovni's message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2019 18:23:31 -0400")
Message-ID: <yblwodp2xkx.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/UeflaYclzoENZ3XX7tjipE45m90>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2019 23:06:41 -0000

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> writes:

> 	... but no signatures are presently valid and some (often all)
> are expired.
> 	... but no signatures are presently valid and some are not yet valid.

Ok, changed to that text.

> Which raises another question: Can an OPT RR legitimately carry more
> than one EDE option, and thereby communicate multiple errors?  Such as
> perhaps the above hypothetical with some RRSIGs expired, and some not
> yet vlid.

Yes, the draft discusses including multiple EDE reports.

-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI