IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 04 December 2013 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80751AE21A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:45:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jvNf-hAV7SSY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267811ADFCC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 01:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A52D528044E; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:45:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0E6B2803C3; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:45:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E33C4C007E; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:44:49 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:44:49 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org>
Message-ID: <20131204094449.GA5492@nic.fr>
References: <BF87877A-8989-4AA4-9ED1-52C82E1BC538@nominum.com> <alpine.LFD.2.10.1312011206480.12923@bofh.nohats.ca> <20131202151651.GD16808@mx1.yitter.info> <A12FD3E0-58F6-4490-877F-A9C59405F717@vpnc.org> <6DBBC8339C394DBDAE4FE1F764E02A8D@hopcount.ca> <20131203170825.GA17211@nic.fr> <21D03162-81D1-494A-89A9-41BE89D28A0E@nominum.com> <BB7627E9-8D50-48E5-B809-64AE4D574271@virtualized.org> <20131203221006.GB5689@sources.org> <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D3E446D0-F9ED-4671-A1C2-29A15D3DE010@virtualized.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.2
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [internet-drafts@ietf.org: I-D Action: draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-names-00.txt]
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 09:45:26 -0000

On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:50:37PM -0800,
 David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote 
 a message of 63 lines which said:

> This implies every time the IETF makes use of 6761, those tables of
> special labels is going to need to be updated (and I suspect the
> chances of this being done universally and consistently approach
> zero). 

It seems a criticism of RFC 6761, not of the current registration
proposal. If this is so, I would say you are a bit late, 6761 is
already published.

> Ignoring that, other than aesthetics, what is the downside of
> <p2p>.alt or <p2p>.not-dns or <p2p>.arpa again?

My main concern will be that it won't be easier or faster to get a
<p2p>.arpa and we'll see exactly the same discussions.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email