IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl> Fri, 06 November 2015 17:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@antoin.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12BF1B2CD5 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:50:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.483
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.483 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jxwhJCyJx_21 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:50:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walhalla.antoin.nl (walhalla.antoin.nl [IPv6:2a01:670:6aa4:da00::6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1340E1B2C4F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 09:50:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.114] (unknown [192.168.0.1]) by walhalla.antoin.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 741AC280110; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 18:50:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antoin.nl; s=walhalla; t=1446832233; bh=RGrC9HeYbDIXnNzZjeLu/Fmltco/unmiLS4pkDpPtik=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=GwBsIGaBFDFVxXgl5G7313kT3/qyD2uO63KNaqu2ygtIvDjMxtxndmif4DI2VeFr4 nD6HMju84ZOICWO8vZV7ocm5YFBbfjDCJqwNFAhYa4NMIk5FEx1Hl+1mP5vs44HIiM oXhKiNiVQz4ref8hj8NeGWyaJAXcdj3TK3iQhAUA=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_55220A79-4DB6-43FF-9FD9-51CDED3917FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Antoin Verschuren <ietf@antoin.nl>
In-Reply-To: <8D78B784-34D3-421E-B82C-52DD32E22B74@fl1ger.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 18:50:28 +0100
Message-Id: <0A76BF2A-D0EB-4111-B2DD-D85F011B04F6@antoin.nl>
References: <20151105235402.39FFC3BF2F29@rock.dv.isc.org> <8D78B784-34D3-421E-B82C-52DD32E22B74@fl1ger.de>
To: Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Uq3F6xNPWqIT6Yb8mWJXmTAquek>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 17:50:44 -0000

Op 6 nov. 2015, om 08:46 heeft Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de> het volgende geschreven:

>> 
> Really TLDs doing repeated checks? I know some do when you
> register domains, but repeatedly? Examples?

.nl f.e.
Registrars get a monthly report on DNS errors with a score of how they technicaly compete to their competitors.
In addition to that, they get sent a feed of validation errors for DNSSEC for the domains under their control.
.nl managed to get validation errors down that way to improve DNSSEC adoption on resolvers.
See https://www.sidnlabs.nl/a/weblog/de-dnssec-validatiemonitor (in dutch, google translate is your friend)

- --
Antoin Verschuren

Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL
M: +31 6 37682392

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email