IETF Logo Mail Archive

[DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Re: Moving DNS64 (RFC6147) to Internet Standard

"jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> Mon, 13 April 2026 13:46 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=1563c5a74c=jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Original-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dnsop@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFF4DB3A7F4; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ietf.org; s=ietf1; t=1776087992; bh=WcsDxdyUBVR+W9kAlFgKCoch/SCKL3l1lJmffZrKxY4=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=DHKA/zPGg6w/VdySpti2iHVqcQ43Ld4olI0j/WUpHm+oFLsrSDZsrP49F85L0nyU/ 9XPjvA7gG5fg9tuX8lA24sIOG3uy4zqhiuIQx1tTI1TJ2XcjJdEoOj9a0PwPjK/CWf yOcxlD6+SiY+0QOKUVU8f3Vohs0K0IS3QmeTsiME=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=consulintel.es
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oWYLrEaM2nKf; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:46:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.consulintel.es (mail.consulintel.es [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:495::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F490DB3A6BF; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 06:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=consulintel.es; s=mailer; t=1776087959; x=1776692759; i=jordi.palet@consulintel.es; q=dns/txt; h=Content-Type: Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To; bh=WcsDxdyUB VR+W9kAlFgKCoch/SCKL3l1lJmffZrKxY4=; b=cHl8ifNzfFAJBdhL6n6QRBMTm pn0RU4oPleDBXRRG9MHTe/Tr88ROlvB8ZPaHX3b6SOF5jSJd/KtegOWhc0mgP7bX 5LE3UINZvpw3oSpg7Lb4VYzqh9mn9zr3XKcvpxZ47mHsiKiThAqPm0O/ozbL6sVu 6k4Zzp+buaF5nkxml/NPBlkdsZtxMkeRDCv9iTmwaHitUgu+zYWvDP48lJodSF2o feAT9gM6m9qFS96FVmv6Kr8Eq85V+DBktGymgoAV4BG9+feM3APdKAHmBOCQO0V5 6+sPeWfQbn8AIqSApT8TMH5l/44TlHquvFc/EWsBFcnavtRjHdQFMTgHkUQTg==
X-MDAV-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:45:59 +0200 (not processed: message from trusted source)
X-Spam-Processed: mail.consulintel.es, Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:45:59 +0200
Received: from smtpclient.apple by mail.consulintel.es (10.10.10.5) (MDaemon PRO v25.5.0) with ESMTPSA id md5001002622675.msg; Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:45:58 +0200
X-MDRemoteIP: 2001:470:1f09:495:39c0:8573:a909:1d84
X-MDArrival-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:45:58 +0200
X-Authenticated-Sender: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Return-Path: prvs=1563c5a74c=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Envelope-From: jordi.palet@consulintel.es
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3864.500.181\))
From: "jordi.palet@consulintel.es" <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <m1wCHUo-0000QZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2026 15:45:43 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A969A5C-EE2A-4581-AAC3-20A1423D0D43@consulintel.es>
References: <m1wAunU-0000NEC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <2338256.t9SDvczpPo@localhost> <038ae9d1-34fc-4085-aa6d-76ef79287857@gmail.com> <PARP264MB6760A67BB8F2060962E8A64088592@PARP264MB6760.FRAP264.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <B93DB6C8-2974-4915-93DE-DFCB6B858AFA@consulintel.es> <m1wB6jW-0000VYC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <25022.1775841874@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <m1wBGFD-0000PhC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <5539.1775850116@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <m1wCHUo-0000QZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3864.500.181)
X-MDCFSigsAdded: consulintel.es
Message-ID-Hash: T74MH2VEYFDOABETRQATP4CFM5PNAZ3U
X-Message-ID-Hash: T74MH2VEYFDOABETRQATP4CFM5PNAZ3U
X-MailFrom: prvs=1563c5a74c=jordi.palet@consulintel.es
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Re: Moving DNS64 (RFC6147) to Internet Standard
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Ut0rJu7wu6EP9agJ8isehMvF27U>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Philip,

> El 13 abr 2026, a las 15:38, Philip Homburg <pch-dnsop-7@u-1.phicoh.com> escribió:
> 
>> People who wrote v4-only applications will just fail on v6only hosts.
>> No confusion.
> 
> You mean people why write dual-stack applications will just see them fail
> on v6only hosts. Yes, that is an issue. And that's an issue we need to
> address. Not by adding DNS64 and predenting everything is fine, except for 
> a long list of things that all don't work with DNS64.

I will like to see that long list of things that don’t work with DNS64 in the real world.

We really need that in order to say if in reality DNS64 is doing harm (or not).



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

v2.45.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status