Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Wed, 11 November 2015 10:53 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1CA1B3462 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q962K9cP0uBQ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [217.70.190.232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DED1B3463 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 02:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 9CFAF3BBB8; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:53:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EDF81906C9; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:48:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 11:48:33 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
Message-ID: <20151111104833.GB29290@sources.org>
References: <20151105235402.39FFC3BF2F29@rock.dv.isc.org> <20151110152511.6f1a1c20@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151110152511.6f1a1c20@pallas.home.time-travellers.org>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.2
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/V-9_9polZukX3KUEjqiGw58sFzs>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Asking TLD's to perform checks.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:53:13 -0000

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 03:25:11PM +0100,
 Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote 
 a message of 49 lines which said:

> My guess is that part of the resistance is because you are going to
> be asking people to spend money on something that does not provide
> them or their customers any (direct) benefits. Further, it breaks
> the registry-registrar model in some cases, where registries are
> kept away from registrants by a 1.6 km-high wall.

+1 && +1

We at AFNIC have a long experience here since, during many years, we
requested successful technical checks before registering a domain (at
this time, there was no registration without delegation). It annoyed
people a lot and we got a reputation of pain-in-the-ass stupid french
people, always insisting on local and anti-american requirments (see
<http://www.circleid.com/posts/afnic_dns_server_redelegation/> for a
good example).

I'm not eager to try it again, unless people pledge to support us
during flames on social networks.