Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 20 March 2017 02:03 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E817512944F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 270EwE7cmz_9 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3843412944B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.32.60.42] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v2K23BVa068585 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:03:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [10.32.60.42]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Terry Manderson" <terry.manderson@icann.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 19:03:18 -0700
Message-ID: <6DDEFD26-A6ED-4E26-B5C0-1D1EEFFD509A@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <1E14B142-680B-4E30-809B-68E03EB6E326@gmail.com>
References: <1E14B142-680B-4E30-809B-68E03EB6E326@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VH8xlWD4iBV26ahqh0rpTWo7QME>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] WG review of draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 02:03:24 -0000

On 19 Mar 2017, at 18:44, Suzanne Woolf wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The INT Area Director who oversees the homenet WG, Terry Manderson, 
> has asked DNSOP participants to review 
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03.txt 
> <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-homenet-dot-03.txt>, "Special Use 
> Top Level Domain '.homenet’”, with the following aspects in mind:
>
> 1) in terms of RFC6761
>
> 2) in terms of the _operational_ position of an unsigned entry in the 
> root zone as requested in this document, to break the chain of trust 
> for local DNS resolution of .homenet names.
>
> This document is the product of the homenet WG, which has asked the 
> IESG to approve it for publication, so our comments are strictly 
> advisory to the IESG. There was some discussion of the draft on this 
> list shortly after it appeared, in November 2016, but it’s always 
> the AD’s prerogative to ask for additional review.

Clarifying question for Terry: do you want us reviewing it now, or after 
he has released it for IETF Last Call? I ask because the draft's authors 
are aware that there are still a bunch of 6761-ish issues (from two 
different reviewers, of which I am one), so there might be refinements 
coming before IETF Last Call, or maybe not.