IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] KSK-Sentinal: Once more down the naming rathole.

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> Wed, 21 February 2018 19:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jabley@hopcount.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A5A12DA21 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hopcount.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEq7KSEJZl6T for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x230.google.com (mail-lf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950FD12DA1D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id x196so4054951lfd.12 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hopcount.ca; s=google; h=from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=c8cGiPdK11M7m2scS6eu4cVVYBnakKegi8UQk+noZy0=; b=Mu+J1i1Lv8HtiKK6SQrbrnQq7z0ATyai//SCsHwdF1hrzFgtT4APuZL6S4s52slYdb ah78b4rNQQHdd1k98Ysh0ripIm9FmVQY6Tq714M5U1Hbked6+HfjicvIsHqGZbssBLkU 2iIW8xcqRZIup9tq/hu+2kJxnec76bqIRVoPs=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c8cGiPdK11M7m2scS6eu4cVVYBnakKegi8UQk+noZy0=; b=f4yVwi4k0PR/rgf1yhrkeJR7MBVKNaN/vsdGrVgF/7giVpmOvPXO7V3NBLlhNQ2D5m TErMv3qYPV4bxvu8dcsmL4eWUFA8kn6UVmBlPYQtYLVGWxwfy+5adNi69hahS+J1N/PK 1GocQkZKKxNORgvHw+r7VWN//sJmTze/FU0RtLd2R/p2NnYE6qxhOZwwdQ+G04C8Mvu+ 508WH4/ht374HVBjCsAdKB0qULDY9hiLLZKecVAPUWT97BquixMmV35xnUhjgK8198eu 2hYldYdXcxVRyUvbuKpYy1PS86zk3LgXeiaf8mXwtk0PWrTpNxBLjajgNkEsYNiFRoG7 p5cQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPAUvUqR5j3qotPiVXP5uMQYub3jTCbeiBJ2ka7DW1D2PvprFVVG YqnJK1Cu6J3lBczKY9LpPyx4Yg8y3uZUfHLNtqu3sw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227qkbRRZufloFF1kNQJOvbO+MsvW2HXuwzpoeML5bNxabzyCfq3KFb6hJPEv8rBZE+IVY6SR3Im8eEANJpd0wg=
X-Received: by 10.46.13.10 with SMTP id 10mr3397545ljn.8.1519242805655; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:24 -0800
From: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
References: <CAHw9_iLqEerV-So7704qu7A2mbD6YQbzdF8A3FEGtUPOE+6NWw@mail.gmail.com> <DC8845C9-6329-4A02-97F9-45C991726F71@vpnc.org> <CA+nkc8D6zbVMJmntTtEub0iLSB=3Qf8khMu6VibOGrDM55oXpA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+nkc8D6zbVMJmntTtEub0iLSB=3Qf8khMu6VibOGrDM55oXpA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 11:53:24 -0800
Message-ID: <CAJhMdTPLdVVFCdRTzr9B3sZKGcf0D2pw6C80+V18GqX_=K-2ag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VIposoJkSnViGqGY8_RPYshc5UQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] KSK-Sentinal: Once more down the naming rathole.
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 19:53:29 -0000

On Feb 21, 2018, at 14:43, Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> wrote:

> Prefer numeric, since RFC4034 specifies that for display, and everywhere I see key tags in a google search they are always that way.  "dig" shows them that way.


Me too, same reasons.

Why did 8145 specify hex? I don't remember the discussion.


Joe

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email