Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Tue, 22 October 2019 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6147A120219 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:49:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oc6jAG6DQ9Ku for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A45C120086 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:49:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:46786) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1iMrjM-000RXO-gA (Exim 4.92.3) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:49:36 +0100
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 11:49:36 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Petr_=C5=A0pa=C4=8Dek?= <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <bd6d286d-0bec-9b00-f819-231d7c0550db@nic.cz>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1910221143230.8949@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <CADyWQ+FG7qzPnLkUH7mSBca=1NfXy6YduHD4UdmcfXFjD8xC6g@mail.gmail.com> <20190917075620.avbllsx6kwbiof2z@nic.fr> <yblh84xz4qg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <1515406254.3112.1569654220499@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <ybl8sq54hoh.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <CADyWQ+F34gNLBdejDSicxZiweRJ367i-KdWtxhW6bx2jvZidNQ@mail.gmail.com> <bd6d286d-0bec-9b00-f819-231d7c0550db@nic.cz>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="1870870841-1364740041-1571741376=:8949"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/VWWyuO1FY1Vh_gxRfhfepWWdJws>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Second Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-extended-error
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:49:44 -0000

Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>; wrote:
>
> 2. Second problem is that it is uncelar if there is going to be a
> consumer: Did *anyone* from stub resolvers said a word about this draft?
> Is it useful as it is?

I expect almost no-one can do anything with EDE without
getaddrinfo() EAI_ return code extensions.

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>;  http://dotat.at/
Plymouth: Variable 4 or less. Smooth or slight, occasionally moderate later in
west. Mainly fair. Good.