IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> Mon, 29 February 2016 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ray@bellis.me.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365721B3E1D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:32:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nVX4INMyThT for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:32:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hydrogen.portfast.net (hydrogen.portfast.net [188.246.200.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3E0A1B3E26 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:32:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [46.227.151.81] (port=59731 helo=rays-mbp.local) by hydrogen.portfast.net ([188.246.200.2]:465) with esmtpsa (fixed_plain:ray@bellis.me.uk) (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) id 1aaWMo-00048E-Ov (Exim 4.72) for dnsop@ietf.org (return-path <ray@bellis.me.uk>); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:32:38 +0000
To: dnsop@ietf.org
References: <20160229180756.55888.qmail@ary.lan> <56D4BEB3.3060409@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.11.1602291705250.30909@ary.lan>
From: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <56D4C70A.2050701@bellis.me.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:32:42 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1602291705250.30909@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/ViU0qI5s9Zmpe9fBF5cBsnLKLdw>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] SRV-related _underscore registry (was Re: Call for Adoption: draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:32:46 -0000


On 29/02/2016 22:27, John R Levine wrote:

> The existing port and service registry already has all of the _service
> names, and is updated as people invent new services.  What's the benefit
> of duplicating it rather than just pointing to it?

+1

[and this is pretty much the proposal I made to Dave back in Orlando...]

Ray

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email