Re: [DNSOP] draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-02.txt

Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> Tue, 05 March 2019 13:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C261310A6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:32:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ybV9_xz4ji3v for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oj.bangj.com (69-77-154-174.static.skybest.com [69.77.154.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 979831310F1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 05:32:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.182.62.203] (mobile-166-172-58-60.mycingular.net [166.172.58.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6464D292DB; Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:32:10 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16D57)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051313260.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2019 08:32:09 -0500
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C6FF2C58-0AFE-453C-993A-E3B7CA4C4ABC@bangj.com>
References: <155174561875.5229.8071756187245291024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <49504B63-84EA-4E56-AF96-30F2AE09450F@bangj.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051216270.13313@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk> <734DF7A6-4EC1-4BC1-8704-94CA7D4254FA@bangj.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903051313260.19193@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Vlp52ri-ivojkpGfwal_Nojb8cc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 13:32:15 -0000


> On Mar 5, 2019, at 8:20 AM, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> wrote:
> 
> Tom Pusateri <pusateri@bangj.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sorry if that freaked you out.
> 
> I wasn't freaked out, I just thought the response was directed to the
> wrong place. I didn't bring up the issue for a two-way discussion, I
> wanted to see what other wg participants thought.
> 
>> https://github.com/pusateri/draft-pusateri-dnsop-update-timeout
>> 
>> and anyone is welcome to open issues if they like so I don’t think we
>> need to replicate this info to the mailing list each time.
> 
> The wg mailing list is where group decisions are supposed to be taken.
> I don't particularly want to have to poll another (counting the dnsop
> drafts) 35 places to find out if maybe some discussion has happened.
> 
> Tony.

I agree with you on this. The issues are  for the authors and including the participants was a courtesy for them to be informed when the issue was resolved.

However, since you seem to object, I will discontinue this practice. 

Thanks,
Tom