Re: [DNSOP] requesting WGLC for 5011-security-considerations

"Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Wed, 05 July 2017 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71854131D9D for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:23:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id keT7HLhFaE1A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A02B4131DA5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [169.254.16.195] (142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.proper.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id v65HMJtb026977 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Jul 2017 10:22:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.proper.com: Host 142-254-101-176.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [142.254.101.176] claimed to be [169.254.16.195]
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
To: "Wes Hardaker" <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:23:01 -0700
Message-ID: <31A2BD38-AB02-4224-91F7-4944435D498D@vpnc.org>
In-Reply-To: <ybl4luqq05v.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
References: <ybl4luqq05v.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/W0EO695yYSEI5gGsLKt3SoJn8ug>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] requesting WGLC for 5011-security-considerations
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 17:23:20 -0000

On 5 Jul 2017, at 10:11, Wes Hardaker wrote:

> Folks,
>
> We believe that the latest draft-rfc5011-security-considerations
> document is ready for WGLC, and would like the chairs to start that
> process unless anyone thinks it's not ready to go forward.  In
> particular, we believe all outstanding issues with it have been
> resolved.
>
> Objections?

Just a note that the actual filename for the draft is 
draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations, and it can be found at 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc5011-security-considerations/>