Return-Path: X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A09A12E036 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:42:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.701 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=gpMVTrs6; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GiLbS6kL Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nFXh9AhVs83z for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:42:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32C8412DDA3 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 14:42:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F303721F46 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:42:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 07 Jan 2019 17:42:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :message-id:date:to; s=fm1; bh=qCsgnAhIygc9HcWHDR+j5PEjvffLuSNvu pIDjRL/sgA=; b=gpMVTrs6v9LHjUvFCzlyQJzUwRNU8RFS6oiykJGoySBDRNUsu +TP0yriIihc20B7WSUHYPi+15tKlkZTFynW4pbcuXtJVNhFEBk78wP+nqTG/QEit 33pj74U3sLbFklM0UTmUDXEvxUHFz7J/PNmzJxDy8HLPDqANfc0JxWbwwANtYgG9 STMAUjTbQi00lTiN4OkOZ3s7oIhJrkNfZBRU2YfNgVfuqRtt3OxsIJeoZCowff9F aC4J0FAkmWB2VWiPIiOd/yVF1snU3jYF0NfMult4WKNOWOV/4/CHL6jSgEgfr0p9 QXwFu/pN/nHX9jH/0kOCWn6FgCaFK6rkKaySQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=qCsgnA hIygc9HcWHDR+j5PEjvffLuSNvupIDjRL/sgA=; b=GiLbS6kLOUEaom8CqTHikc ERFO3uzU6LUglWkhIIDhjwq3qoDNunbfWn5MzC4tsQxHBlwX7aaCf1KzI0L+yUag 9tsC0JHnzoHBe3faZ0cMLzJto8HYA7TGufCMfrDrtLgFl9+kGBNsq+Oqo6c3rx7y udlx65dcM+23X/Yew3o9N1JhpnjmqQ4tlcjW5TadFnK9c7w6UDdkd2pecRYKeXiv pePhwnlN9oDbUP7QsynC36yjYnAsq6RV2PmLGWUmP36tWMdg1/R5iV0+L83o1FDf kCqXhK6NDCk4Dbm15OpY7QxHklj8n1BzQAdRRFxOPSWuYgWdD0Q+3PRCsmfs9h1Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtledrvdekgddtudculddtuddrgedtkedrtddtmd cutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfhuthen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhtgfgggfukfffvffosehtqhhmtd hhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhho thdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehhthhtphifghdrohhrghdphhhtthhpshgrnhguoh hftghouhhrshgvihhnshgvtghurhhithihtghonhhsihguvghrrghtihhonhhsrdguohdp ghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhmnhhothdrnhgvthdphhhtthhpuhhrlhhsrdhithenucfkph epudeggedrudefiedrudejhedrvdeknecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhho thesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1B3DEE4599 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2019 17:42:40 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Nottingham Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Message-Id: <0A018ACB-9958-4202-9263-00EA864E2C5C@mnot.net> Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2019 09:42:36 +1100 To: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) Archived-At: Subject: [DNSOP] Accounting for Special Use Names in Application Protocols X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 22:42:47 -0000 Hi DNSOP, In the HTTPWG, we have an open issue about how to account for .onion in = HTTP URL processing: https://github.com/httpwg/http-core/issues/10 Our discussion led us to believe we'd do better to have a general = statement about special-use names when dereferencing HTTP URLs. It's possible such text might end up here: = https://httpwg.org/http-core/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-latest.html#http= .uri ... along with the following section on HTTPS, and of course in Security = Considerations. Do folks have thoughts about what it should say, and would any one be = willing to help? Cheers, P.S. I haven't CC'd the HTTP WG to avoid issues with cross-posting; I'll = point the WG at discussion here. -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/