IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 15:55 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C531D1296F8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:55:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pCGRyV6DM9lG for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B9AC1294A0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 6083 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2016 15:55:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 21 Dec 2016 15:55:33 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:55:05 -0000
Message-ID: <20161221155505.27311.qmail@ary.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <cf2f8970-10a4-15f7-6e96-7490fa983c02@bellis.me.uk>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/W3mUAYO4TD18WbkQX8VRePdD774>
Cc: ray@bellis.me.uk
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-vixie-dns-rpz-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:55:32 -0000

>Those malevolent actors are just as capable of using DNSSEC.

A lot of the arguments I'm seeing here boil down to "my users are
better off with a signed A record pointing to a site that installs
Cryptolocker than with an unsigned NXDOMAIN or SERVFAIL."

There may be a world in which that is true but I'm pretty sure this
isn't it.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email