IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 08 May 2015 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C501A1A7E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:37:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.762
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.762 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-L3zKVh0Mdl for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6D71A03A0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 May 2015 13:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14020 invoked from network); 8 May 2015 20:37:28 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=36c3.554d1e88.k1505; bh=nLf0e+xqJLzKsyvUK5DXCTujX/v476hjvfllCD9BDmQ=; b=qGXq1As3yyNa1npmY6n8ama1j9xWho9UrQtJnHqLl7lW1+k/NNPILWvDWQRujZR+x1/JFxG7xHdKhtRXeAdzPZuUMUlOW5KjMyN6qG6mWzIQGpFJG9FZSlTr9r3wXxSxlR+5J42v+5opqnN4uJTRomppEo5eohcXHvpxu5e5xtceJJ8EFUte2Gp3IBe5c/xX8edfgxVqKmp7QUVswDZ3WdTus1JZ06tjottsa2VoqlwdjdD82t5z/p2+PYBnafhZ
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=36c3.554d1e88.k1505; bh=nLf0e+xqJLzKsyvUK5DXCTujX/v476hjvfllCD9BDmQ=; b=KM8DuvWZ2evykANLJ1PThZgbXtzGLt7jjg5OnHfUZ2zL9aZeg0RFHU0FfIfCqkTzHYWytSMbLasVZZ3jyNNTunFcyo0QhURCQHj92cs3rkMWry2XbgNg9lG4Zv02FV/TpNvm69mkAUZ+UgNMkCnhsi5P488EyuCP/J4aWf0JOAXlNGXdAlRcV4vM+P8xIK1+d++C9XdXzWZXm0BRqShZJefHbjtWxcI9nsNUdZpAKc8LAmxcnT1/+KlWpTTMofKX
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 08 May 2015 20:37:28 -0000
Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 16:37:24 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1505081636310.30695@ary.lan>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150508203559.ACC372DF52BA@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20150508194223.55320.qmail@ary.lan> <20150508203559.ACC372DF52BA@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/WXe5NYn1wrihs9AcxXdSN4zx13I>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Interim DNSOP WG meeting on Special Use Names: some reading material
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 May 2015 20:37:28 -0000

> I'm not, but name leaking is different to name use.  I suspect "mail"
> ends up being qualified whereas "home" and "corp" are actually used as
> private tlds.  This difference requires different handling.

>From the viewpoint of the outside world, what would be different?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail.

PS: I'm not being deliberately obtuse, I'm being actually obtuse.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email