IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt

John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> Fri, 05 June 2020 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7A63A0D9E for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:41:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.851
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=nnZxRyf6; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=YtTn+O7A
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jdokoyMIxcz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABBA3A0D8D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 13:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 85276 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2020 20:40:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=14d19.5edaadda.k2006; bh=/cVGDfmH7F3uAGXzRY/OWqgrejSBy6A05ksqs2P11yw=; b=nnZxRyf6mx50zJ5ZhhCgNzZydMah1bzgnnx3BLwulVSahFJcQTIu7yVxuixMFWlQsK4ejPo3kJwQ7CX7vc/D8eQ0JuQBEekqCEzbqCwX8mL6cHlalGtnnPEm0UTok/hs72qh/h+J77WjivwtSfFBLXMmroOfpZe/+3UVbIi7eYXHYXF1yA1nKE9qDVixpfu+7hsNkAK2CFjYm6VbJQnrJBt1//a/75o7L8Oeq+bOIrnfRyF7MCYHXEOMn8oAqW7J
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=14d19.5edaadda.k2006; bh=/cVGDfmH7F3uAGXzRY/OWqgrejSBy6A05ksqs2P11yw=; b=YtTn+O7AsKZ2PS+brc0lPW5RmiGcTTcOgnaGF8e9ctXYcu9r4ALuoNOaWmEVKdkTOIuAGBCfezEBDE+nrvubxoXucv+U99RxmcNKKnXql1oNIQKd8m9lRNOzSy1O/Ezms7tuMPhVS9BY2uXip650jxPV2wPv0m5DTNpwqu2Y5LKZZuqzWl45lTty8Y5Kb7PJ4U3u8KOZly2V7ZZeyf7CdT9H3DzrKwuzs7bS7iQjU2yzJWtnSa7JuYGpC5NCsMxR
Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 05 Jun 2020 20:40:57 -0000
Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id E46CD1A34F01; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 16:40:57 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 16:40:57 -0400
Message-Id: <20200605204057.E46CD1A34F01@ary.qy>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: dwessels@verisign.com
In-Reply-To: <5E86E9EE-A022-44F0-9483-F498A03C39C4@verisign.com>
Organization: Taughannock Networks
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/WdGKXxSCHjYcP5suQ1McA361Jgc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2020 20:41:06 -0000

In article <5E86E9EE-A022-44F0-9483-F498A03C39C4@verisign.com> you write:
>> The current document is indeed ambiguous. I propose that it be changed to:
>>   If all glue RRs do not fit, set TC=1 in the header.
>
>I believe this is contrary to how most authoritative DNS software works today, isn't it?

I hope not. If it sends only part of the glue without a hint that
there's more if they requery, that's a recipe for failure. People sent
some examples last week.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email