IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Implementation status for ZONEMD?

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Tue, 22 December 2020 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C7A3A137F for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:07:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TAYqcasrs7Nv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:07:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [116.202.65.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE793A1378 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Dec 2020 16:07:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D626008F; Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:07:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1608595632; bh=1daEwVXTKfZQ/ntW27x1vzPaFN9GQ2xu538YLGc7O/Y=; h=To:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gwYtu/vl5tAnLwdnH5G22eudDXa96HOsHsYbFwkc7ebTw0QRuyJV1MBd5ZWW9g78N jG6oqYnUlpX/TDcspze3JOhPgYib8+xSzPkY0AEgExZV/sgUzJuNlIxCuLFz86Dtao FFXqatzsdb9pnG2Tmz6x4azv1ku7HmRTP4Y18nVx3Y/SwW3L4Ov5oy6OzRH8A++3ks KI/e22eB6rBgx7/hYpD/rwyDL3sAABwVkm6ZgNz9zWz04w6DmrlFtaGxnk9pMMmQVW 3UjU391LUJjhoIkmSvg6gNA+TON4HSOrlfq8RG9e9Sy44AZnZYn03nqS730Igm4zgm JINvd0jw0/5VQ==
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <ED068CDB-A808-457D-8A99-A834B4E5FA19@icann.org>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <8327f72a-295a-44f4-4f50-84485f47df4a@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 01:07:10 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ED068CDB-A808-457D-8A99-A834B4E5FA19@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Wgxthcm5FAqEenLWh-mU5v9QG_U>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Implementation status for ZONEMD?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2020 00:07:19 -0000

Hi Paul,

On 18/12/2020 22:57, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Greetings. Now that ZONEMD is waiting in the RFC Editor's queue, I was wondering how the developers are coming with implementation. The protocol is ripe for two-party testing.

<NLnet Labs hat on>

We have implemented ZONEMD (verification and DNSSEC validation) in 
Unbound, ready to be merged into the main branch and released early next 
year.


Cheers,

-- Benno

-- 
Benno J. Overeinder
NLnet Labs
https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email