Re: [DNSOP] new ANAME draft: draft-hunt-dnsop-aname-00.txt

Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> Tue, 11 April 2017 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <each@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803DA129AB6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lt8j73uJ7K3d for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E7D127601 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 13:31:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bikeshed.isc.org (bikeshed.isc.org [149.20.48.19]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35ED83493E8; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by bikeshed.isc.org (Postfix, from userid 10292) id 28E6C216C1E; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:31:34 +0000
From: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter van Dijk <peter.van.dijk@powerdns.com>, dnsop@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170411203134.GA6670@isc.org>
References: <20170407181139.GB66383@isc.org> <cc3bbc7a-3f48-2f7f-a3d9-3f752874fc00@redhat.com> <86FE867E-E1BE-4427-9FB2-D148B3F9C8C2@powerdns.com> <94f7e821-d3a9-8c12-b17f-01d32c383182@redhat.com> <20170411201616.GC3533@isc.org> <742429b6-4c96-5ee5-caf4-6785d983ffb6@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <742429b6-4c96-5ee5-caf4-6785d983ffb6@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Whw9t4S-KVFUDEsM5XiP0XTWBdc>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] new ANAME draft: draft-hunt-dnsop-aname-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 20:31:37 -0000

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 10:21:13PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> But what happens when the target server also performs cache filling at 
> the same time?

If two servers end up being unable to populate their address records
because they're depending on each other for answers, then you end up
with two servers that both return SERVFAIL on address queries.

-- 
Evan Hunt -- each@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.