Re: [DNSOP] partial glue is not enough, I-D Action: draft-ietf-dnsop-glue-is-not-optional-00.txt

[Joe Abley <[e-mail]>]

On Jul 7, 2020, at 12:57, Havard Eidnes <he=[e-mail]> wrote:

>>> this is the draft where that issue would be decided, so it's
>>> good we're talking about it. ...
>>
>> by the way, this is what kato and i, and later jabley, were
>> trying to get at with
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-respsize/
>>
>> but it was like moving mud with a toothpick, so after eleven
>> years (2003 to 2014) we gave it up. there are probably some
>> good ideas in there, even now.
>
> I've read it, and most of it makes perfect sense to me (I think I
> have one paragraph I'd like to discuss).
>
> When you say it was like "moving mud with a toothpick", was there
> any active opposition to the draft, or was it just a lack of
> engagement?

I think there was a general lack of interest. I still think this is a
good document and would be happy to continue working on it if the
pendulum has swung the other way.


Joe