Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Fri, 24 July 2020 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B8D3A10D1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjZxSaEVuqnK for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157A83A10B0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 10:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCxWP4bP3zFMx; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:48:17 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1595612897; bh=DjfZLLH6UyWnlFoG/Rx9AdwwTEfeN982gGiLiP5QiMc=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=HEAbhWQTQbuwy1K10h0OF9GKQzmgBEYeXiElHGt59boT0eXKRAK27O3eRWZU+VUXP YRRIjIKFw10zhdiJ7XMNW7mZDh+0nR/N+4PqggYG1HCj+iiI9Axx/uz7d/UDQsXTbx jFucvT9dLbLP8HRzz15U7n2Vgowf2Zt1tyZcYmbM=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vLEaVJB8ciLS; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:48:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (unknown [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 19:48:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 67BC36029BA5; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F60F82C94; Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 13:48:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <326eabee-22e0-0890-a460-a941002c16a0@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2007241345040.255204@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <86c18e80-88ab-5503-f63c-f788766a2675@ghnou.su> <20200723172449.GA371024@mycre.ws> <1C6ACEA9-CCC5-41F5-AEAD-432B48370D12@hopcount.ca> <CADyWQ+Fisgr3cNoTGiwrAgeEKrFfWEw=jxDCy_vm+Pf7XXE6cA@mail.gmail.com> <326eabee-22e0-0890-a460-a941002c16a0@bellis.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/X8thBmqnUxWz_CyFIcPpoK7iOa0>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Question regarding RFC 8499
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2020 17:48:27 -0000

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020, Ray Bellis wrote:

> "master" and "slave" are both nouns and verbs.   It's very common to say
> "this zone is slaved from <hostname>" and it's completely gramatically
> correct.
>
> I have been trying to avoid those words in my own language recently, but
> using "primary" and "secondary" ends up creating some very awkward
> language constructs because those are only adjectives and nouns and
> there's no such word as "secondaried".

This zone is replicated from <hostname>

Although replicator and replicatee does not really work :)

Maybe we can Original Server and Copy Cat :)

Paul