Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 05 November 2018 08:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C5C12D4EB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:43:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wafW7u4qxtwJ for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:43:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F24C9130DC8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 00:43:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id f12-v6so5928616iog.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:43:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=RHPW9cDPPDceNPz2LFmE+7cnEOYOQW91bB3+FVD+czk=; b=p0vsa8NeyzX71iksZKSU+Ok3z1O0q5gBvqPSb3822qjnPnUvKhe4feMBVbhRzpTRF1 ePGOxFzv/Me/Bs25foVKu13ShmqEl6mmhGqDyAwdef9OjvFESkOeCNPETQGrDi6bfNrE L+k1gvaT8hBpuZd+3tuKogc4rGvSrumL2RtcH2D8HHmqykKjLaUD9h8RynKGntYEgW9W a+vrEB9gf9wnLFef1NR5YvEIvGwOWNgi0FSfApc/koZcm6HaWmL7whnKzO+2Xx7qucqI vMbz4ZERoUs+QV0EnhAh1ug1gLUGr9cGa9pJ/pZ3cIkOMkL9mwIkZf/bCbHiGd7ZJ966 734A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=RHPW9cDPPDceNPz2LFmE+7cnEOYOQW91bB3+FVD+czk=; b=LoYzrR94T1F2/xOQWL16Q2hfUVKwTgUomi4bSrTQro76G3lhNjSbAEizeF+RrOl35R plPAH9tToAsWPuXcVHgSfh/4Wp7x09c3byOHa/DzEyNK2QibqDy0Y3VR/BmvmyznIAE6 my8j1GLjYAvBN68kT52JG36WeDhD5P8Tv8oZX/qKiTZyzv9taEgI62QMjDkqbjusWuah YbWgTfkIK+hj3dYQKStS02XUgdGv6r9PhunJ0FJ+QfK6VKRBynLcfcGyaZ1kPlzme3Lf 6hos2HOIAZ5c0T59kxaGcL9MCEKwnYV8KDWhX1mvlb7f3rYhQu1yAVaPTS7d0SXHsXpy LAPQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJwQVDlC2LTuu3B0ZuVzqQb+BdPL/7YFD+Mn1nLLa1of8bxG7i6 cOtGGVbB2iPbWbXvd5+7Mp97QJGw3oAttw75wDU3og==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5e2T/HgyBpkX/HB6tJJ4eNGsuEyR5cSjdHdDnVu/XPaOeyqmeOpEwXfJfhNHCAwLopkO+bf3t+A8ILs0vuifHs=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:4106:: with SMTP id n6-v6mr16111344ioa.150.1541407429217; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 00:43:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAH1iCip60jtt8o-3jcnvGZ4bMLynFAS3Xo+Qk5G=cVaWq8oTug@mail.gmail.com> <ca3808f9-afc4-0035-50cb-b9eebc8c1d02@bellis.me.uk>
In-Reply-To: <ca3808f9-afc4-0035-50cb-b9eebc8c1d02@bellis.me.uk>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:43:52 +0700
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+Ek57CkJRLR=dbNs=ciyXrjO2wbej5AHs45z1BVWN50-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000045d3d90579e6e2d0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/X90bYb4T0kyk7x9oLrTKDjRdZzk>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Minimum viable ANAME
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 08:43:52 -0000

I agree.  We're not trying to boil the DoH Oceans.

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 3:42 PM Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>; wrote:

>
>
> On 05/11/2018 12:51, Brian Dickson wrote:
>
> > It's a lot better than ANAME, and I think we do a disservice to
> > ourselves as a DNS community, if we do anything other than put our
> > collective support into it, preferably unanimously.
>
> Thank for you the support!
>
> > I see getting http adopted and deployed, and fixing the single major
> > web-specific deficiency in DNS, as critical to attempting to head off
> > DoH, which is the biggest bugbear at the moment.
>
> But please, let's not get into that argument.  The only way to stave off
> adding complexity in the DNS to fix the CNAME at apex problem is with
> the cooperation of the browser vendors (and as Tim notes, the major
> authoritative operators).  We need their help, just like they need ours.
>
> Ray
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>