IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] opportunistic refresh and Happy Eyeballs

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Tue, 15 August 2017 17:28 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2A71323A1 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKww4fDGJiMN for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [24.104.150.213]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCDB1323A3 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:14c:5d3e:8d2a:c80c] (unknown [IPv6:2001:559:8000:c9:14c:5d3e:8d2a:c80c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2601461FF3; Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:28:16 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <59932F2F.9030504@redbarn.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 10:28:15 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.16 (Windows/20170718)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
CC: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, dnsop@ietf.org
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1708150911470.3655@uplift.swm.pp.se> <9EED4C56-8B35-4013-861D-0B86F66483E0@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <9EED4C56-8B35-4013-861D-0B86F66483E0@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/X9kDXoekVMAMqsd3zo_XOE5D0NY>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] opportunistic refresh and Happy Eyeballs
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 17:28:17 -0000


Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>> On Aug 15, 2017, at 3:25 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson<swmike@swm.pp.se>
>> wrote:
>>
>> What is the opinion of this wg on that topic?
>
> There has been much discussion about doing away with any/255 and I
> seem to recall some discussion of a ANYA type which would return AAAA
> and A.
>
> This is something I see value in being implemented.

as i've said every few years when this proposal comes up, it's unnec'y.

we can specify that AAAA be sent as additional data for QTYPE=A, and
that A be sent as additional data when QTYPE=AAAA.

given identical deployment curves along both the ANYA and
additional-data timelines, we will get identical results.

-- 
P Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email