Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt

Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu> Tue, 14 November 2017 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <rharolde@umich.edu>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6426128D44 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:23:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=umich.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFUssfIXFrNq for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:23:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397E4128BC8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:23:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id j28so12439756pfk.8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:23:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=umich.edu; s=google-2016-06-03; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QT9BEnnritPfLk8+a3xyMzCZJGYZbI1T4yVAlfw4bNY=; b=DH6t86UF5oYmnKqcPEz4whiweJwn3AwYipfRmLmC+yJ34bZrIUsnXg2O0gmDJWigyt a4WtMga+pGbfATDEy7dW1osaeDFNUep47qsdke32gq1VdVITxSaFySSBFkJA9qGNQTnC IHWc9Zy1aQ4MIAeXb3onHmUGnGfN4HdwIx22weBsd34kP0a2c6w+O8btTIWAs8vOviXk u/kJW9SkKIz+PiOSfGQ9oUbqqfLHw5G2pqrMYRE4zkzdVW5jWHso7mvYwOTtAdetQcOP YsfRRwqhqNJ0KTaqq01/o2wEIKqffb08W+x3DEWW5ligbv2iGYfj1y6Cwks+3ySG/JQ/ bQew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QT9BEnnritPfLk8+a3xyMzCZJGYZbI1T4yVAlfw4bNY=; b=tDuj7yPg7dmcRemWeQkdR/PZuKIO3n2tssGv4T/xtjoTS/l13kENglITJP2D2cTYHB vEcjO/ILbt/w3eYMx21wu0kxHv6polYsMYlFc0dkz0jeEAtFJuRQZDk4XYBbqn0piUsE LKQAkR1F/o17yu2bVqH3UllXAQVyRLurdW49zRHscEW0jEb0a3kFYbjyxpNH8JwwWote hsN5VQQ/bVSxpunzfuC6ie5b9xiswE6YsDT0SBVjFuizfx8OI4t4IlbBRISpv7YKxPM9 DWngpVuTbAhdwLQIuKEALcXsYwtz8rSL4bGlfcphJeK7NRDbEo/ZWYdZM07PoRZlTHsn kHTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX6Y7FBmDefFsRpho7zkL/L9lkKfNpZ19mZGm7ub+LsI5fME596s fHuL/lo4LRleCNZPF8ZoKCxN9RdkD7NdW2lRoI1dgfX9
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMZeuaMq+8RWl8hECmAr4yyAIMOnaj4zkk6yPmslE2lrI/ZIhXUjulNogubGdMYRzRhAqc6PfRqCFppIp3iUEjw=
X-Received: by 10.101.82.76 with SMTP id q12mr5733651pgp.140.1510676597560; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:23:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.171.6 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:23:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <151062636258.5917.14497839377888768972@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <151062636258.5917.14497839377888768972@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Bob Harold <rharolde@umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 11:23:16 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+nkc8CQPe6eT6QGWmO30Cn1ik5oaGUxS_GQg0BproCPSu-U6Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: internet-drafts@ietf.org
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403043e6878f7e8e3055df3cd74"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XCs0jZdHMdPH2D4HcVzmisuUKR8>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 16:23:22 -0000

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 9:26 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations WG of the
> IETF.
>
>         Title           : A Sentinel for Detecting Trusted Keys in DNSSEC
>         Authors         : Geoff Huston
>                           Joao Silva Damas
>                           Warren Kumari
>         Filename        : draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04.txt
>         Pages           : 8
>         Date            : 2017-11-13
>
> Abstract:
>    The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) were developed to provide origin
>    authentication and integrity protection for DNS data by using digital
>    signatures.  These digital signatures can be verified by building a
>    chain of trust starting from a trust anchor and proceeding down to a
>    particular node in the DNS.  This document specifies a mechanism that
>    will allow an end user to determine the trusted key state of the
>    resolvers that handle the user's DNS queries.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-huston-kskroll-sentinel-04
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
Looks like you clarified that "_is-ta-<tag-index>." and
"_not-ta-<tag-index>." are the left-most labels.
Thanks, that's an improvement.

I like the draft.

If I have to add those entries to each zone, I worry that the automated DNS
appliance that I use might not be able to create the broken records
required.  But I am not using DNSSEC yet, so that is a future issue for
me.  Still waiting for more automation (CDSKEY etc) and 'time' to work on
it.

-- 
Bob Harold