[DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 03 July 2017 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7229F12EC35 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:14:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9L8sff2zoM_y for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22d.google.com (mail-vk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F87C12EC01 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 191so101328469vko.2 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0zU62tE4zlq6N5aCr/wQOYzCUnUltCd7Vg6z4La+w5k=; b=uvkIOODumUX2210FA5rQpEUpV9zWnYcxItLh6gNRNnsZ2UVod5XWmhktyTUVioUvlE OZnxQUyv+LI6yn2UwUwrGXgdtXrDBjbMsMVlfjnN78t1H5nr5PJAYiYzqfJ319015vdd q+6kETYfK/u6G6cwcuPvNtSxfMvUzPu+QeUCvZc98/F29MR985S3vyzOc+epq3hb+p66 iZqyP8LaXppOkfW4JzBNE/CvLAWdD2lYeSDuCYkgTfuO09AqdZio37YRD+7/elWQCE6/ peHm3HhKEwXiPCQ0sEy1VA/E+SayCImXPR75ONGH2tc4KhP4P2Dxk7MahB2oVnWmHWTh 2mlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0zU62tE4zlq6N5aCr/wQOYzCUnUltCd7Vg6z4La+w5k=; b=ojhYABfiJED4QDhaRXCUasIguaOBNVIMqY/1xBM5Fe3277Hi35IuESoBhF+zVMO9jJ +nAts4WKybUO/wiY3bFb7oyHo/SxCaibN5m6zw4EVIJDgCyaBFaD7Jkv/6MXXjJElJaY kVg+MZIO2wxwAUtyd/Cw8NVsqnRoqTNXmyYLJsrrOA93XhhsxhR2RipNFo0jZz+uHX1f 7SAOYrC7g35H812BUfw6MK7KlsLXgQKpCiWnO7wc481Vv2OqsLTJqYWwbELzWQIc4hck 8McVf9z0E6eC8H2V9i3HxOloCIPy+7NdGMdPhUR8LFckyLmxcvuh9pzeK9AGTfM1nwi5 +8Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyGZpkTXSJFaHQcY5vCPjG7GCprGyI+RlV/S4LoEbXexlADDFUz sPvFx5piTLlwCJ3F/Ag89GpUN+fhw8Zy2527JQ==
X-Received: by 10.31.65.87 with SMTP id o84mr20109731vka.7.1499116439368; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:13:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.159.39.165 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 17:13:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJQ31wqLavOhtMpPOBhGP4j6CLk45KHGdX5vOA+qj4nQA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Cc: IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XE83GzQ9xhlPuvWN-kehET9oHQs>
Subject: [DNSOP] Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 21:14:02 -0000

Hi all,

The Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement document unsurprisingly
contains a list of problems.

This was an unordered list of 21 problems, including descriptions and
sub-bullets.

While trying to write another draft referring to specific problems it
became clear that it would be much better to have this as a *numbered*
list, so that one can refer to specific problems and say thing like
"This helps address problem #17" instead of "This helps address the
problem in the list which begins with the text "foo bar baz"...

I have checked with my co-authors, the DNSOP chairs, IESG and
responsible AD, and have updated the document changing the list from
unordered to numbered (and adding "This is not an ordered list, it is
numbered merely to facilitate referencing specific problems:").

The consensus was that this is a purely editorial change, but please
scream if you disagree -- the document is on Thursday's telechat, and
Benoit is the responsible AD.

W


On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 2:56 PM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org>; wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : Special-Use Domain Names Problem Statement
>         Authors         : Ted Lemon
>                           Ralph Droms
>                           Warren Kumari
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07.txt
>         Pages           : 29
>         Date            : 2017-07-03
>
> Abstract:
>    The Special-Use Domain Names IANA registry policy defined in RFC 6761
>    has been shown through experience to present unanticipated
>    challenges.  This memo presents a list, intended to be comprehensive,
>    of the problems that have been identified.  In addition it reviews
>    the history of Domain Names and summarizes current IETF publications
>    and some publications from other organizations relating to Special-
>    Use Domain Names.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps-07
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop




-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf