IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] unsolicited HTTPSSVC responses

Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 16:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ericorth@google.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8CC3A0EE8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fn1h70egyJGb for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807943A0EBA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id r15so3633091wmh.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5hsb1kdI+0YUXOSE91QphXQA0TnNYNSjz/2oNu55poM=; b=JOdaLs936y2WA6GhQLG+gpK4qvidTve+/PBpJ7INZ665Dy20aEV4yUIrLv65HqN2S1 xG6yX0MILq9V+gciZ7syA4mxT5Q4ivlykNOHoC6AKAh6FCyONxZ2cwQ3d+l0Cgb03ces juHrZQrRm/5RfAUFiK6boqGm7Z4Rur7u5danH/jJbWHwk1qFV5Ek2cHmMW7Q2BZ9TSbS FerRw9pUQdmPHxWfFNxG94S/WyoSGmJJF2dryIulgdZ+ORfV0Ib5qkeXaZLw/t2loTCl VR9kbn0u7q99dAgPNvnzPmTrGN5dg1l2m9aUt6Fm6NRLhB0rpXU7a3MQ3hk5Zwn4Sjlq l9gg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5hsb1kdI+0YUXOSE91QphXQA0TnNYNSjz/2oNu55poM=; b=EZ065dbGyX1LZJ4oBVxiw9Gxq9iob2FGGVYZjhJeF6xED+0TfzndREPkLgtr0xMJnT Nn4XmRzTQ7SMnez5GZRFeKRWxv8Y4L50DrIGuPad+6hF4pT9Z5jh2DFAnHRACIt2a1sA fqPVLps23hroBGjN9LrmHFBwezzlyTworeiR0ufuzdLZnWTIW7LFvvq+YZ9F2Ttr9RQR MRCMVMJ5QfbBp+PMwpNbZfdoavVV/GT4ht+++tKvYzxWjZcnhuEW6ngqAtmMOBHwZLLZ pQAdjyQjmj68jhTUcvWro8zPMLXEikjyzY8LkkUIrRjn9nGIZnzhEO7OFxgjZzcULztW CYYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533dfMX254lhGr6r0P++M99ziQOETn6qY9FZ9Gw/zYXZQH1+2uiQ qqFwdEscfv9963lO3kUyW5LrI+T+gUQ+hDyUMBi7B3P/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkjrGtQXj600iZd+ADSf0pVjNH/rgPoEBzu5jmN8N5MZ3j0OnxaSHZjz5WbZle3YSEQZDqIyYdgLao6VHSpRg=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7e03:: with SMTP id z3mr4962193wmc.89.1590596112830; Wed, 27 May 2020 09:15:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMOjQcHAKC6ge2te8eqPz3JFmmLrpBoTSt2yKKxFXHpQEyjLqg@mail.gmail.com> <D2203FC0-7D91-49DC-A238-0A49577C24D7@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <D2203FC0-7D91-49DC-A238-0A49577C24D7@icann.org>
From: Eric Orth <ericorth@google.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:15:01 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMOjQcHpjornp15bYQ-wEr7dSF2e321qfV_tWPmwSbrKpMpYtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000049975d05a6a3847c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XFP_Zz_D4rTLI916klcFKBcW2co>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Ext] unsolicited HTTPSSVC responses
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:15:34 -0000

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 8:18 PM Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:

> On May 26, 2020, at 12:43 PM, Eric Orth <ericorth=
> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> > One of my colleagues recently brought up the idea of suggesting
> recursives add additional HTTPSSVC records into responses for A/AAAA queries
>
> Add where in the response? In the Answer section or in the Additional
> section? The semantics and usefulness are wildly different for those two.
>

I assume Additional, but I honestly don't have much personal perspective on
the implications of which section is used since from the perspective of the
stub code I deal with, it's not an issue to look for HTTPSSVC records in
either section.


>
> --Paul Hoffman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email