Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost

=JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com> Thu, 21 September 2017 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E841321BB for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:06:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IEVt0aY7Nbl6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy1-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [173.254.64.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2BC012ECEC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cmgw3 (unknown [10.0.90.84]) by qproxy1.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457451202FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:06:35 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from box514.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.114]) by cmgw3 with id C06Y1w00C2UhLwi0106bje; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:06:35 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=K/VSJ2eI c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=9W6Fsu4pMcyimqnCr1W0/w==:117 a=9W6Fsu4pMcyimqnCr1W0/w==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=2JCJgTwv5E4A:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=o1Ym26DpRQwWE5MmH5MA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
Received: from c-73-202-80-238.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([73.202.80.238]:51578 helo=[192.168.11.53]) by box514.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>) id 1dup0h-000S1i-Tz for dnsop@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:06:32 -0600
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@KingsMountain.com>
Message-ID: <b1f0105a-314a-8ffa-d8ff-d8359bc2348a@KingsMountain.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 17:06:30 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box514.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - KingsMountain.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 73.202.80.238
X-Exim-ID: 1dup0h-000S1i-Tz
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: c-73-202-80-238.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([192.168.11.53]) [73.202.80.238]:51578
X-Source-Auth: jeff.hodges+kingsmountain.com
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Source-Cap: a2luZ3Ntb3U7a2luZ3Ntb3U7Ym94NTE0LmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ==
X-Local-Domain: no
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XXadBmj981rtPW8p9y2Qs4etuNA>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] DNSOP Call for Adoption - draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 00:06:37 -0000

 > This starts a formal Call for Adoption for
 > draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost
 >
 > The draft is available here:
 > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-west-let-localhost-be-localhost/>
 >
 >  Please review this draft to see if you think it is suitable for
 > adoption by DNSOP, and comments to the list, clearly stating your
 > view.

I support adoption of this draft, with the understanding that the 
working group needs to come to rough consensus on some of the 
(subtle-but-important) details within.

Am willing to review, tho am not a DNS expert. Upon reading through the 
-06 rev and this thread, it seems overall good-to-go to me modulo 
resolving said subtle-but-important details.

HTH,

=JeffH