IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02.txt

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 23:21 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56F1129421 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:21:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzFscpeWqND8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:21:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (dawn.hardakers.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:187::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73671295DA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:21:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B28B3217D; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:21:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
References: <148616456120.4133.8494448927223938318.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHw9_iKYkZNG=JLSUbCVpsrmkupFM6635eMHJsQXDWcLJmLgKQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170206131153.52329a04@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <7dd02b3e-910b-b287-14cf-d7fe7755cd2d@nic.cz> <ybla89mcdcg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> <yblwpcqavtg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 15:21:23 -0800
In-Reply-To: <yblwpcqavtg.fsf@w7.hardakers.net> (Wes Hardaker's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:29:15 -0800")
Message-ID: <yblo9y1bu30.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XaAbDg-3BQXwPXT4iHcHA9VYvr0>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, Petr Špaček <petr.spacek@nic.cz>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-hardaker-rfc5011-security-considerations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 23:21:26 -0000

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> writes:

> Fortunately, after a quick conversation we've recovered the reason.
> Publishing a new version with a break-out explanation shortly.  The 3/2
> is absolutely is needed.

I've published -03 which adds new text just below the equation
explaining the components (and the equation got more complex to match
the complexity of 5011).

Anyway, please do let me know if you think the new text adequately
explains the problem to you.  I probably need to go back and insert the
"worst case" timing into the example timeline, but that would make the
example a bit more messy.
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status