Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)

"Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com> Mon, 09 March 2015 16:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A391B1A8BAF for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:31:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEVsfjg8iMAv for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp101.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp101.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 698F61A88D0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp21.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp21.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7E673180596; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from app44.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by smtp21.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E420D180578; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
X-Sender-Id: ogud@ogud.com
Received: from app44.wa-webapps.iad3a (relay-webapps.rsapps.net [172.27.255.140]) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.4.2); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:31:00 GMT
Received: from ogud.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by app44.wa-webapps.iad3a (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BEE18004A; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by apps.rackspace.com (Authenticated sender: ogud@ogud.com, from: ogud@ogud.com) with HTTP; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:30:59 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:30:59 -0400
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_20150309123059000000_99675"
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Type: html
In-Reply-To: <160462ED-64C9-4C85-AFB4-72845991EAF8@vpnc.org>
References: <20150306145217.GA8959@nic.fr> <54F9C29E.9040408@jive.com> <54F9F90D.1020806@redbarn.org> <54F9FCD3.7010204@jive.com> <54F9FDFA.2030405@redbarn.org> <CA+nkc8AyOvMwpoXQYmubxmWjKvkQwXYr1QaLPOoA1E-ahpV7wA@mail.gmail.com> <2C465FAA-166E-4BF0-97BB-20905AC4BFF4@cam.ac.uk> <42657AF9-53D5-4CFE-B1EB-F0235E59CFE3@ogud.com> <160462ED-64C9-4C85-AFB4-72845991EAF8@vpnc.org>
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Message-ID: <1425918659.823915245@apps.rackspace.com>
X-Mailer: webmail/11.3.13-RC
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Xfo_S2rgYAhyq-nLDXENLnaeDz0>
Cc: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:31:08 -0000

Happy to pick a less offensive file name :-) will discuss with co-editors (Joe Abley is also helping)
 
Olafur
-----Original Message-----
From: "Paul Hoffman" <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Sent: Monday, 9 March, 2015 11:51
To: "Olafur Gudmundsson" <ogud@ogud.com>
Cc: "IETF DNSOP WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] More work for DNSOP :-)



On Mar 8, 2015, at 6:23 PM, Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> wrote:
> There is a new version in the works, expect it late tomorrow (monday) 

There are questions about whether NOTIMP is the correct response. Given that, please consider starting a new -00 without "notimp" in the filename. That will help make it clear that you are open to the various changes that might come in the WG. Proposal: draft-whoever-metarr-acl-00.

--Paul Hoffman