Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"

Dave Crocker <> Tue, 28 March 2017 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D881294A8; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GZyLuIUgS2fL; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA97C129452; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id v2SG3ptB025451 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:03:51 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=default; t=1490717032; bh=Jak9H4yho5D4WswFgnpQ3hcdcy7Xt10ts/HTH/RlY+4=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=HqkxRcckJmB965IiG0wYVi+T50l+SqfrG2pM7hBM9gLdTh5/K+iPc8DUbiR+JpLPT TkVaYTnKYAWam+J6bQUgrsgoMwIppRhGohGcgw2hC+kdUww1cL0ypxRSJbyVl6a3q9 4PkZ9h9uIWYtClONNXMl3d5+xEaHOASEhML/iS6o=
To: Bob Harold <>, IETF DNSOP WG <>
References: <> <>
From: Dave Crocker <>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <>
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:01:39 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] The DNSOP WG has placed draft-crocker-dns-attrleaf in state "Candidate for WG Adoption"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 16:01:52 -0000

So, now that this draft is re-activated, I'm perusing old postings

On 12/11/2015 12:46 PM, Bob Harold wrote:
> _adsp. has trailing dot, none of the others do.

The current model is to ignore 'subordinate' underscore names, such as 
_adsp and treat them as out of scope.

> pgpkeys missing leading _

ack. good catch.

> _im listed twice, but with different rfc's - should at least put the
> entries next to each other

So it turns out the entry was multiply wrong.  Basically, _im and _pres 
are _Service names, subdordinate to the _Proto name and the later is all 
that this spec now needs to cover.

Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking