IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00

bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com Wed, 21 October 2009 00:47 UTC

Return-Path: <bmanning@karoshi.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424A23A688F for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EcyWBUGNHBaD for <dnsop@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vacation.karoshi.com (vacation.karoshi.com [198.32.6.68]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA3B3A67AF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from karoshi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by vacation.karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id n9L0lJ1L014277; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:47:19 GMT
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by karoshi.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id n9L0lGhq014276; Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:47:16 GMT
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:47:16 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Message-ID: <20091021004716.GB13618@vacation.karoshi.com.>
References: <OFA656600E.F5229B3D-ON80257650.005247BF-80257650.00527644@nominet.org.uk> <82skde36c9.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <DE23E9BF50E437E2D5CA65C8@Ximines.local> <82ljj61gle.fsf@mid.bfk.de> <200910202329.n9KNT56j048843@drugs.dv.isc.org> <1F61DD04-14A6-4349-8650-9CF27D27C3BC@hopcount.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1F61DD04-14A6-4349-8650-9CF27D27C3BC@hopcount.ca>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Cc: Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk, dnsop@ietf.org, Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fw: New Version Notification for draft-bellis-dns-recursive-discovery-00
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:47:56 -0000

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 07:38:19PM -0400, Joe Abley wrote:
> 
> On 2009-10-20, at 19:29, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> >>ARPA will soon be signed, so I don't think this is much to worry
> >>about.  If the powers that be finally agree to make NXDOMAIN/NODATA
> >>synthesis the default in the upcoming minor DNSSEC revision, this  
> >>will
> >>also help to cut down the number of requests.
> >
> >And LOCAL.ARPA would need to be a unsigned delegation.
> 
> Could you explain this? The draft under discussion specifies that  
> LOCAL.ARPA is not to be delegated at all, so your sentence above  
> confuses me.
> 
> 

	Think ... kind of like RFC 1918 prefixes are not supposed to be 
	advertized.

--bill

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status