Re: [DNSOP] Adding more example configurations to draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 26 October 2018 11:14 UTC

Return-Path: <dot@dotat.at>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130DE130DC0 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 04:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zQM43dAABZye for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 04:14:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13E8012870E for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 04:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://help.uis.cam.ac.uk/email-scanner-virus
Received: from grey.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.57.57]:43006) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.137]:25) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) id 1gG04X-000KBo-Kh (Exim 4.91) (return-path <dot@dotat.at>); Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:14:33 +0100
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 12:14:33 +0100
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
To: Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk>
cc: dnsop@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <75129a2d-8f91-48ca-dc27-7d6dfde685e0@bellis.me.uk>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1810261210150.24450@grey.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <47597960-3D11-4007-947D-19DBC7AF2BAC@icann.org> <75129a2d-8f91-48ca-dc27-7d6dfde685e0@bellis.me.uk>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Xp0QK0KBirsfp5mfzp-TAbOXuAE>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Adding more example configurations to draft-ietf-dnsop-7706bis
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:14:38 -0000

Ray Bellis <ray@bellis.me.uk> wrote:
>
> I'd like to see examples of configurations where the local root copy
> *isn't* on the same host.

It's basically the same as the examples in RFC 7706, but you use the other
host's address instead of 127.12.12.12. RFC 7706 even says,

   The examples here use a loopback address of 127.12.12.12, but typical
   installations will use 127.0.0.1.  The different address is used in
   order to emphasize that the root server does not need to be on the
   device at "localhost".

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
Fisher: Cyclonic 5 to 7, becoming northeast 6 to gale 8, perhaps severe gale 9
later. Moderate or rough, becoming rough or very rough. Rain then showers.
Poor becoming good.