Re: [DNSOP] Moving WG documents forward

Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl> Sat, 31 July 2021 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B5D3A189A for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:02:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P4gdCqD-sD0P for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:fff0:65::8:228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DC0C3A189C for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 13:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (unknown [10.10.3.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A47419; Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [159.69.232.142]) by soverin.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1627761718; bh=AAB2zSLgYgN8vaNr3vSa/tZIlXpnJB08nNMTT6pJK38=; h=To:Cc:References:From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=v0T38y6Z8pFCxJCrsCGxXRm8Z3r5cud3OxWvaGMnUTuzKZHEfYPBXass+ifeQ2FJY bHfyxyN4kgM6EgTB6HYFlOiuFh6XCYfAfaggyIGGc3TksqZs5FSiGnSWDYfzPzNd93 uHez3M0dAS5FpDNAkUX0rK0glDxSjigZmgB34DRaEm8iO8RhwK+T2pBxNuIuIMQXhN PKSU/HjB0KkTvJ3dna+TuFiaVMSWbWQnG/Wc0eN7vvkD5uZP6S8VyNjoUd1G1Kl1Hi whf7NuDwxGImoQNVfeEJeSel0rc/eecBGZYuBdMPZ0w0SD7vUK95P69cQC+YLQWNYx ROb7hqyMzZt6A==
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
Cc: DNSOP Working Group <dnsop@ietf.org>
References: <6ACDD435-1817-4B1C-8724-F984DC0D3B60@dnss.ec> <0E721930-2B00-4546-A6CE-99ED6B0AB1BC@nohats.ca> <a91f4f02-b704-d13b-61d0-36baefbd4da8@NLnetLabs.nl> <830608CE-5B52-442C-83BF-248A95798AFC@icann.org>
From: Benno Overeinder <benno@NLnetLabs.nl>
Message-ID: <669f3c19-35da-55c6-d852-fe4263fa45d0@NLnetLabs.nl>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 22:01:55 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <830608CE-5B52-442C-83BF-248A95798AFC@icann.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/XyK_Nnh82p_rKTBICCoOfdDf1yI>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Moving WG documents forward
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2021 20:02:10 -0000

On 31/07/2021 18:38, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2021, at 4:45 AM, Benno Overeinder <benno@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
>> For the individual drafts, the DNSOP chairs will contact the authors and discuss the way forward with the WG.
> 
> During the meeting, there was a call for more transparency, and co-chair Tim strongly agreed with it.
> 
> Please strongly consider reversing those two steps: discuss the way forward with the WG, *then* contact the authors (who should be following the WG anyway...). In the unlikely-but-possible case where the WG wants to move forward on a draft and none of the current authors want to do so, the chairs can ask the list for new volunteer editors.


Agree that the WG determines what happens to a document and that is 
discussed by the WG, that is clear. It was merely a sign of courtesy to 
contact the authors of the document first to let them know that it will 
be discussed.


-- Benno