Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 06 March 2014 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57861A02E6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:39:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0xaNkvd485Oj for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047B31A00F4 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 7474928071D; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:39:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F7D928071B; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:39:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:8::7:113]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642294C0081; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:39:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 18:39:07 +0100
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Evan Hunt <each@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20140306173907.GA29260@nic.fr>
References: <201403051107.s25B7ext069332@givry.fdupont.fr> <02410136-DFE2-42C8-A91E-AA84641AFFCF@ogud.com> <20140305144213.GA19170@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1403051637160.18502@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20140306145020.GA5976@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <20140306173132.GD22321@isc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140306173132.GD22321@isc.org>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 7.3
X-Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Y1d8IDclfY8-PBJIiJWvu0PBfkU
Cc: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] my dnse vision
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 17:39:45 -0000

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:31:32PM +0000,
 Evan Hunt <each@isc.org> wrote 
 a message of 12 lines which said:

> I think that's exactly the point that was under discussion,

It's a very valid and interesting point but it has not a lot of
relationship with the privacy issues. I suggest that it deserves a
separate effort, which could start with a nice I-D describing the
problem statement/analysis (and then to proposed solutions).

Unless we want to solve all the security problems of the DNS at once,
with the same solution?