[DNSOP] Weekly github digest (DNSOP Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 07 July 2024 08:37 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E454C18DB99 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 01:37:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, TVD_PH_BODY_ACCOUNTS_PRE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="hAJCLDKD"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="bd6ask9J"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F0cuoNRirXva for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 01:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.155]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82DC1C14F6AD for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 01:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1579111404AE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 03:39:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 07 Jul 2024 03:39:19 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1720337959; x=1720424359; bh=DkLR6ty9tivNELLJ5fwbKJeZXsPjvQeBiIb F24E5rSc=; b=hAJCLDKDx+D6XmUxsqVW066OaQJPwoemp/32O4XW3bCb9EQPcwX usb/bjQmQNOlUxb8Ya/qiSQKcVsXFzaJc+QNuzbf8SU7xvm9oxXkFfnPuH/hMnAg lxf2iyaydKoWAcmeW0O5zXyOkoroDOHBQEt8mqNQtuqaFp0FgIL6sWr1XGdWiuax rSQQDEijThqXvaRbFXY72uaZ1/n1NYK+hhYUhNXgEIwtFMScoz+m6mqtMYWI0o/L ZSftxcNJWSA9UZQp1KH/OiwZ+N3IxLk9NV0GPZAqW5Shakc+naghqtWXx9sznikz qd3XZq7ut8K2T27Lx4GFWC3LM3dxNVby7gw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1720337959; x= 1720424359; bh=DkLR6ty9tivNELLJ5fwbKJeZXsPjvQeBiIbF24E5rSc=; b=b d6ask9Jq2/PZWKsFhrLkbJoQqNyWUzibjG0GOX9RVw16Sbd2maK3Fx8/xFHKFvcs UEXIlH7agECcyABM5DogTqWwob4T/g5+UbzDalpblLfPiM2yTch2i9DbOm8ObYXm QeC/JR97KVgXAaxooWoDUIQasH2Gu+LZRp4qDr2fgTYxYK3QMHT47bxIXX8MX3VR 3hKx2Ceb2JPMoXUg4xYUt3WTWpo9SdReI06+ULGpX/81PxIE32Pssv2MMWEhBOzH zsftb91/4G1hoNMdq/d2YhPy1BcpPXOGcMJmPfZ1qmPS9lVEfFyLrE5PMJNNGlp9 8qfAO70NvDh5C09ipt7TQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:JkaKZhCPTF9CyO7yJ8gvLNSxPEe8srAIlKIZmHjr6BHsV_0xugyIxA> <xme:JkaKZvhl12axB0QX2DsKR5PSCkts9jMNFWS-_7IzNvJizimbbJXS2dkII-MYNynX7 Gz-iGVLXbBoYTo8pA>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:JkaKZsmSU1cwzP53c1v64ZtT-gyYerBKGzfvw7JqGSCK7RpKdTOlfjhePLPPjhq7ZhFJIzsVaj9g_sL9VHHuL5I2iJO8qvkqGNykmsYug5cwoh-pIdlcAOXtCZLVuj9m9kqDhQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvdeggdduvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedvnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:JkaKZryBpSjYUXAq81ph2aRwS3ehHwFtPwJx_4AtFBYcrGldc3uPzw> <xmx:JkaKZmTpmt6NhfY8z5R_mSdQB72drku57SsFvc-DL-gAfaDHl4qeQg> <xmx:JkaKZubTu1brYMJa-PnNL_LuHrCzcGJchAwRD4zE2_GoIFl3HYtteQ> <xmx:JkaKZnRu_-yFO6D70ijkLUzoM5vciy_mwGYodAbi4FlDvRWCj4VZLg> <xmx:J0aKZhc_LH1R_ZQ2hikH4QYeMjZC9aBg3MnMHEG6zqpP-bhTyCuv2V1W>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jul 2024 03:39:18 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============6591632565643433606=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20240707083751.82DC1C14F6AD@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2024 01:37:51 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: LA5K5RNLTJI7KJLLYJ6MJNZ74X5YHWBI
X-Message-ID-Hash: LA5K5RNLTJI7KJLLYJ6MJNZ74X5YHWBI
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP] Weekly github digest (DNSOP Working Group GitHub Activity Summary)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/Y7eouFBDcpgAeeWi9BXyC9WUe-0>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
Issues
------
* ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques (+6/-21/💬61)
6 issues created:
- review uses of and capitalize Intermediary (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/130
- review uses of " (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/129
- Add Acknowledgements section (by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/128
- Factor out record type from QNAME format (by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/127
- idnits on current version (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/125
- Perform a broader review of using "Provider", "provider", and "service provider" (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/120 [WGLC]
16 issues received 61 new comments:
- #127 Factor out record type from QNAME format (7 by enygren, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/127 [WGLC]
- #125 idnits on current version (6 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/125 [WGLC]
- #120 Perform a broader review of using "Provider", "provider", and "service provider" (8 by moonshiner, paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/120 [WGLC]
- #114 Authors were going to talk to CA/B Forum (2 by shuque)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/114 [WGLC]
- #106 Reference RFC9444 (ACME for SubDomains) and talk about use-cases (4 by enygren, moonshiner, paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/106 [WGLC]
- #105 Document risks of splicing prefixes and suffixes in different contexts (1 by paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/105 [Ready To Close]
- #103 Give examples for why a PRIVATE entry in the PSL might need to be validated (2 by ShivanKaul, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/103 [Ready To Close]
- #94 Clarifications relative to RFC1464 (including need to better specify key=value encoding) (9 by enygren, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/94 [WGLC]
- #92 Interaction of CNAMEs with prepended attribute labels (3 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/92 [WGLC]
- #74 Registry of labels? (1 by paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/74 [future work]
- #73 Policy constraints as a variant (2 by moonshiner, paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/73 [future work]
- #68 Leveraging ACME challenges for other purposes (2 by moonshiner, paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/68 [future work]
- #46 Relaying info from provider to consumer (1 by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/46 [WGLC]
- #23 Predictable QNAME (9 by enygren, moonshiner, paulwouters, shuque)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/23 [future work] [feedback] [security]
- #16 Domain verification for subtree under or just the domain (3 by enygren, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/16 [security]
- #12 Privacy considerations (1 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/12 [future work]
21 issues closed:
- review uses of and capitalize Intermediary https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/130 [WGLC]
- review uses of " https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/129
- Perform a broader review of using "Provider", "provider", and "service provider" https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/120 [WGLC]
- idnits on current version https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/125 [WGLC]
- Policy constraints as a variant https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/73 [future work]
- Leveraging ACME challenges for other purposes https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/68 [future work]
- Registry of labels? https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/74 [future work]
- Reference RFC9444 (ACME for SubDomains) and talk about use-cases https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/106 [WGLC]
- Domain verification for subtree under or just the domain https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/16 [security] [Ready To Close]
- Document risks of splicing prefixes and suffixes in different contexts https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/105
- Clarify use of underscore https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/47
- Recommendation for encoding in DNS labels https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/91 [Ready To Close]
- Validation and internal only zones and DS record issue https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/96 [Ready To Close]
- Recommend special handling (eg, prohibition) for .arpa and special-use domains https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/102 [Ready To Close]
- Relaying info from provider to consumer https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/46 [WGLC]
- Account specific domain validation records https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/88 [Ready To Close]
- TTL recommendations https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/72 [WGLC]
- Interaction of CNAMEs with prepended attribute labels https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/92 [WGLC]
- Give examples for why a PRIVATE entry in the PSL might need to be validated https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/103 [Ready To Close]
- Authors were going to talk to CA/B Forum https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/114 [WGLC]
- Encourage people to add to the underscore label registry https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/issues/104 [WGLC]
* ietf-wg-dnsop/DNSOP_Doc_Tracker (+1/-0/💬3)
1 issues created:
- draft-huque-dnsop-grease/ (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues/16 [1: Practices] [4: Maint]
3 issues received 3 new comments:
- #13 draft-ietf-dnsop-svcb-dane (1 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues/13 [Authors] [4: Maint] [Ready for WGLC]
- #8 draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis (1 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues/8 [AD] [WG Document] [1: Practices]
- #2 draft-ietf-dnsop-compact-denial-of-existence (1 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/DNSOP_Doc_Tracker/issues/2 [Authors] [WG Document] [2: DNSSEC] [4: Maint] [Ready for WGLC]
Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques (+15/-11/💬19)
15 pull requests submitted:
- Clarify token metadata and relationship to RFC1464 (by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/135
- Add initial Acknowledgements section (by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/134
- Restructure Recommendations and clarify CNAME sections (by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/133
- some suggested text (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/132
- Capitalize "User" and "Intermediary" for consistency (by enygren)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/131
- idnits changes (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/126
- Improve consistency of "provider" vs "Application Service Provider" (by paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/124
- Explicitely state tokens MUST NOT start with _ (by paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/123
- fix ref yaml (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/122
- Tweaks to TTL considerations text. (by shuque)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/121
- ttl rev 2 (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/119
- Shorten text regarding provider help pages (by ShivanKaul)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/118
- Add text about revalidation of DCV records. (by shuque)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/117
- TTL recommendations (by ShivanKaul)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/116
- weak text on cname interactions (by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/115
9 pull requests received 19 new comments:
- #134 Add initial Acknowledgements section (2 by moonshiner, shuque)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/134
- #133 Restructure Recommendations and clarify CNAME sections (3 by enygren, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/133
- #132 some suggested text (1 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/132
- #126 idnits changes (2 by paulwouters)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/126
- #124 Improve consistency of "provider" vs "Application Service Provider" (2 by enygren, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/124
- #118 Shorten text regarding provider help pages (2 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/118
- #116 TTL recommendations (2 by ShivanKaul, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/116
- #115 weak text on cname interactions (2 by moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/115
- #112 ttl recommendations (3 by ShivanKaul, moonshiner)
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/112
11 pull requests merged:
- Add initial Acknowledgements section
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/134
- Capitalize "User" and "Intermediary" for consistency
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/131
- Improve consistency of "provider" vs "Application Service Provider"
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/124
- fix ref yaml
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/122
- Explicitely state tokens MUST NOT start with _
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/123
- Shorten text regarding provider help pages
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/118
- Tweaks to TTL considerations text.
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/121
- ttl rev 2
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/119
- TTL recommendations
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/116
- Add text about revalidation of DCV records.
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/117
- some simple text on underscore registry
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques/pull/113
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-automation
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-structured-dns-error
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-qdcount-is-one
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/draft-ietf-dnsop-avoid-fragmentation
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-dnsop/DNSOP_Doc_Tracker
- [DNSOP] Weekly github digest (DNSOP Working Group… Repository Activity Summary Bot