[DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping (dns-parameters)
Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 15 May 2024 18:02 UTC
Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD39AC14F70C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2024 11:02:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Je7_dEutsG1Y for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 May 2024 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x536.google.com (mail-ed1-x536.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::536]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D44A4C14F5FC for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2024 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x536.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-572c65cea55so4428973a12.0 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2024 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1715796155; x=1716400955; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+gt3Sq+JkCXWHa4/M5guiRDq8HZQTt15+2wP5NWV3LA=; b=MeliGeek1AJlVWw3Kxv86jxD+Ftuv/p0QOoRvtgJwB1AWdTtlSy2KUK+ETX9zyIBuS sQH+MDubGcf9Mj63aFZM/CQZeBNczpmk1do+9Qw/kIw79kkJz354UV2EqYrWrvnFbO2E k7dmZyM1OFiRsqKUIg+ChITMxIcBCrD2l9k4i4xY7UhZbBktqjnRzvu0gLteHU0x5Sec BMbZ75zPlLDlPn+DB918XlIDiJeBBkUgseRgslUExKkDeEsxEC/wrlGHrVcb7RMxL9PU +SsOl0pUE2JE4aMVaYJj4tdHZAYQAXJWOwVdzjL4gGpQUpB9ZG5OJ2F/JV09QMMnkm/R qv9A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715796155; x=1716400955; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=+gt3Sq+JkCXWHa4/M5guiRDq8HZQTt15+2wP5NWV3LA=; b=U/tNVa7Qc5AMwp0QEayLBYvWNVHJlACpPoCYVvmzlO1CSq/vBlfLtZEHzxJ3QVXOxb 3GeyMJk0GIbq5GDxtIBc39SlbPmulrCQO/0Rid4x57PUMTRF9FHciwzdij51mV0DgXgS g1HIiuX3aev4Zjej5Qp/p3wGbQDvS0GTL/5Mfj+ZQs8fZP/byrCYbCMa57Jp3/2GuRkN 9fFjs4pgP86b+0qz1EK8wVSMJ7l75/Ymx7o4IghfO6NBZqXm095Aj7XhgHSIwz6z2kjc gty0hbtKDkUitA09bMFAWgeEmYfCERvllnVfU0FdphwuRDRiuPhIq0wg+1g94XoRHq1u Uz5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxOpfE5yA++e59sACAoIFhYu4SUfJgMukkh/8RTsEbFRbbl+pfK HjOuIhYucnvAKwrsCjWWUY3rcgJ4WVwA7IOaupE95JqeBSc76Qa554/37uHZHb1TX/nD3IlLdJ5 AXMap0fxzlekplYeEesW+9X7dLhvZMw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH2DcHKiLeAchZrH8rr0xPJg5rq9CFPM4/SR/7Wm9BiblkdnHSklIkc3G1OzLshtvCH0xPQ10H2eXhR71FmHCw=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:c31e:0:b0:572:3eaa:a637 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5734d5c1bd5mr14421642a12.2.1715796154894; Wed, 15 May 2024 11:02:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <f9a72bf1-d09d-414d-a0ff-46cefd9907cd@nic.cz> <20240508200231.777E18A4DCA6@ary.qy> <CADyWQ+EUwigV825uW+vKEf6+gpGejBe9U1ZinsfbPH6j-qvGWw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADyWQ+EUwigV825uW+vKEf6+gpGejBe9U1ZinsfbPH6j-qvGWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 14:02:23 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+F_qDtN-WuPMY611wm5YikJrMVhKtL40it8j7p__tvUYg@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051ce64061881ecfa"
Message-ID-Hash: OGBF6CQBZ556CXK63OVT2N6IYUTRR5Z5
X-Message-ID-Hash: OGBF6CQBZ556CXK63OVT2N6IYUTRR5Z5
X-MailFrom: tjw.ietf@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dnsop.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: dnsop@ietf.org, libor.peltan@nic.cz
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-bootstrapping (dns-parameters)
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YA4ZVkbiX6m1nI67PR6HMpdWofI>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dnsop-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dnsop-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dnsop-leave@ietf.org>
When I wrote my reply to Peter, I lost my comment about speaking not as the chair but as a contributor. The point I was trying to make is that the comments from Paul W as the Expert Reviewer for the IANA registry is comment/opinion/vibe that should be considered the most relevant in this discussion. tim (just a contributor) On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 10:29 PM Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > I wrote a note to Peter and his co-author on this discussion and > we(chairs) feel that Paul W is correct in saying _signal is too generic. > > We should not overload any underscore label for multiple purposes. If > another type of operator signalling appears, a new label can be acquired. > Being specific in this situation is a *good* thing. It is not difficult > to request a new underscore name, the process was made lightweight. > The underscore registry is used by application folks as much if not more > than DNS folks. > > Additionally in the Domain Verification Techniques document, there is a > recommended approach to use application-specific underscore prefix labels > > > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-domain-verification-techniques-04.html#name-scope-indication > > I apologize to the implementers on this. > > Unless the working group speaks up, then the advice of Paul Wouters, as > one of the expert reviewers for the registry, should be the suggestion. > > thanks > tim > > > On Wed, May 8, 2024 at 4:03 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > >> It appears that libor.peltan <libor.peltan@nic.cz> said: >> >Hi all, >> > >> >On the other hand, couldn't it actually be beneficial if the signalling >> >zone name is generic enough, and if (in theory on the future) it is >> >shared with possibly completely different signals, possibly unrelated to >> >DNSSEC? >> >> It doesn't seem very likely to me that someone would come up with an >> unrelated scheme that somehow used the same zone structure. And it's >> not like there's any shortage of potential name strings. >> >> _dnssec or maybe _dnssec-signal tell people what the name is used for. >> >> R's, >> John >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DNSOP mailing list -- dnsop@ietf.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to dnsop-leave@ietf.org >> >
- [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-i… David Dong via RT
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… John Levine
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Peter Thomassen
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Oli Schacher
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Daniel Salzman
- [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-i… David Dong via RT
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Daniel Salzman
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… libor.peltan
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… John Levine
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Adam Burns
- [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-i… David Dong via RT
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] [IANA #1362913] expert review for dra… Rose, Scott W. (Fed)
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… John R Levine
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… jabley
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Paul Wouters
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… John R Levine
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Tim Wicinski
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Peter Thomassen
- [DNSOP][IANA #1362913] expert review for draft-ie… David Dong via RT
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… Warren Kumari
- [DNSOP]Re: [IANA #1362913] expert review for draf… John R Levine