IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pwouters-powerbind

Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net> Mon, 27 April 2020 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758753A0C83; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3uHICleaM_gK; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.hardakers.net (mail.hardakers.net [168.150.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54EE33A0C21; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:28:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by mail.hardakers.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C7A852FBC8; Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:28:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Wes Hardaker <wjhns1@hardakers.net>
To: Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>, dnsop-chairs <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+FLrTy0gy8iCyAPsDpiumDNQHX4TGPni43ThA=W3fmZew@mail.gmail.com> <EB400743-8B25-45DA-B4BD-5B27F47AE9E3@hopcount.ca>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:28:17 -0700
In-Reply-To: <EB400743-8B25-45DA-B4BD-5B27F47AE9E3@hopcount.ca> (Joe Abley's message of "Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:37:17 -0400")
Message-ID: <ybl4kt48sxq.fsf@w7.hardakers.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YBdSrQ1DEtjUHXA1eLZAOWbK2VU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Call for Adoption: draft-pwouters-powerbind
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 22:28:20 -0000

Joe Abley <jabley@hopcount.ca> writes:

> This draft needs a more compelling problem statement, and a clear
> description of why other controls (e.g. reputational, contractual) are
> insufficient. [It's also possible that the draft just needs a clearer
> problem statement, rather than a more compelling one.]

Hi Joe,

Thanks for the comments.  I'm working on a more clear rewrite of the
introduction.  I'd love your feedback on it once I get it wrapped up.  I
think (hope) I can spell out the case for support more clearly.  I agree
the subject is a bit hard to wiggle into your head (as are most
somewhat-complex security cases)
-- 
Wes Hardaker
USC/ISI

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email