Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07
George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Fri, 23 March 2018 12:09 UTC
Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC1C12ECC6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t29eJ-hZ1upd for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7A912EBD7 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n12so12237770qtl.5 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:09:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8laTv5AvolN2PE7K/8BPJZuFQbZL2jVtekV4wmmrYM8=; b=IM7TdDEx9617Yoz59y3oO5VraAlC8N9R4aZerAxfpe4tsOgx5iXZf+Urz570AJYy72 SrErfvTsG+yC2s+ATxYs4CdBbpS+35whQCHzizAGZkPZPgpCgPPYdU7bZltiV7mwFj81 43ELfdAx4mAC4rg+ec84D3aqf6PjsAwCb8rhAX4mbn1bcHFkx4xgHQcCmueJlgo0S59p JbYjMysLuUj/MRT391ze04B2v5lkcwiPOWFEjq20pSMXCZnybSn59pjapEkuVPi7/sIf sUg/RnpYpCkzrccGUJj9jE0N0GTEyRiw95Ft0p+Wxf2eGG008MWsIbztrpIqL8Bi92hX e+qQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8laTv5AvolN2PE7K/8BPJZuFQbZL2jVtekV4wmmrYM8=; b=gp8TetECwKc14zdMMec4qAerKhQ+zLC5HVGqkTGzOqZhmq8ZLRNdRE5OknObd1871K zLgyAeANaFPU74hGj5osvtXhV3AwD0+vXqwECUpLt6CcVzVhN9XdyOtLePbO5xEyJ3RP vb5XV9g8zUacZw7rpymLMw8M/YInTxuGJw3EJ8T8PG1fO0Zs7f7CB/X4EmZ8LIrxJWSW zF8KuQ08fi3k79Lg1uemWIYIwWQlZhVNDwEK/H6p5wp4mD/g2BmVpgYchGMRYWaAPKrp RSoatqcfu4zv+DWetF6l8ko0El3P+8O7XCYm8otxjegYoeefmvb4myNCXUChSW6v7VTX 02rw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Fhfpx9y5PoEIAwczemJl6a8x5aXLxi+hWDfX656I1/2HM52cCg V+87OqU1NsuauMATrK3iAsqxJpLBnBjOlP0nyRKwfA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvO7wpHHuPEoDqhS//8kt74QwjPeDt6GGYaxYYRFUcdrfmeuv+j3fXz3edrVQXtyCaCuBBhxHBLM7WbompqBvk=
X-Received: by 10.200.50.114 with SMTP id y47mr41743426qta.25.1521806940340; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:09:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.237.37.11 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 05:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [37.205.61.206]
In-Reply-To: <936585F3-9471-40F9-9D11-E9BBAAF90B4A@isc.org>
References: <83786E94-ABCA-43F9-A038-F8F61C93E797@isc.org> <783C0A50-0DC5-4BC6-A105-F19D2BEF98E4@apnic.net> <C771B8F7-E9D4-4CAC-9277-EAE3AC74CC62@isc.org> <CAHw9_iJM4nZyoytk7xgY_OzU9c7BCEpO4O+Jex9g6A58XYREGw@mail.gmail.com> <936585F3-9471-40F9-9D11-E9BBAAF90B4A@isc.org>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:08:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn3vVxn_tOM_Aij30uMA4fyA0ttVRvzn3Cp2DygHE+5exQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YFMTVbzmklmpYCeP197CDHfAqi4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:09:28 -0000
isn't it a #define string? or passed in via environment from configure? -G On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 11:47 AM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: > >> On 23 Mar 2018, at 10:08 pm, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:07 AM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: >>> Geoff you are wrong. Titles should tell you what you are about >>> to read especially technical documents. There are WAY TOO MANY >>> RFC TO READ EVERYONE ON THEM. >> >> ... you lack ambition :-P >> >>> >>> If I had a TA for andrews.wattle.id.au the current title would >>> indicate that I could test resolvers to see if there is a TA >>> installed for it. >>> >>> The current draft *is not* generic. It is root TA specific. >>> That needs to be reflected in the title. >>> >>> As for the label it can be used for more than rolling KSKs. >>> It can be used to see what resolvers are supporting new TA >>> *when you are not rolling keys*. The current name reflects >>> *one* use, not all uses. >> >> True, it does reflect one use case, not all -- however, we have >> already changed the name multiple times and implementers are >> (understandably) becoming annoyed, and supporting N different labels >> for the tester is also annoying [0]. > > As an implementer I say TOUGH! The job of the working group is to > put out good specifications not to take short cuts just because > something has been implemented based on a draft. This is the expected > cost of implementing on a draft. I’ve re-written plenty of code to > follow draft changes. > > I’ve got code to implement this. Some corner cases are currently > undefined. Changing the label name will cause me to have to re-write > parts of what I have already written. I know this but I’m still > calling for the changes. Not only will the specific labels change > but potentially configuration arguments and with that documentation. > >> How about a compromise - we update the draft name, but keep the label >> the same - the only people who likely care about the label are >> implementers and testers - once someone sees the name they will read >> the doc and quickly discover how it can be used. >> >> W >> >> >> >>> >>> Mark >>> >>>> On 23 Mar 2018, at 8:21 pm, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 23 Mar 2018, at 12:55 am, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This title of this document DOES NOT match reality. >>>>> >>>>> "A Sentinel for Detecting Trusted Keys in DNSSEC” should be >>>>> replaced by “A Root Key Trust Anchor Sentinel for DNSSEC”. >>>>> >>>>> kskroll-sentinel-<what>-<id> really needs something other >>>>> than “kskroll” as the first field. “root-key-sentinal-<what>-<id>” >>>>> really more clearly matches what it does. >>>>> >>>>> Any other changes that follow from these two changes” >>>>> >>>> >>>> I personally think this is getting into bike shedding at this point. >>>> >>>> The title of the document is an adequate description of the content >>>> and folk who want to know more should read the document, not guess >>>> from the title! >>>> >>>> The label is a piece of syntactic convenience and is entirely >>>> arbitrary. We could start an almost infinite discussion thread >>>> over which label is better, but in the end its just a label. >>>> >>>> >>>> regards, >>>> >>>> Geoff >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mark Andrews, ISC >>> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia >>> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> DNSOP mailing list >>> DNSOP@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop >> >> >> >> -- >> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad >> idea in the first place. >> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing >> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair >> of pants. >> ---maf > > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
- [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Geoff Huston
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Joao Damas
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 George Michaelson
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Mark Andrews
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ralph Dolmans
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Wessels, Duane
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ondřej Surý
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Joao Damas
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Paul Hoffman
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Bob Harold
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Frederico A C Neves
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 João Damas
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Warren Kumari
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Michał Kępień
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Ralph Dolmans
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Petr Špaček
- Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-kskroll-sentinel-07 Warren Kumari