IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and QTYPE=RRSIG

Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> Fri, 05 February 2016 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848D51B2E66 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:48:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DMo6w-YfHwME for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:48:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4597F1B2E56 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:48:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found
X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/
Received: from hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.54]:41971) by ppsw-33.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:25) with esmtpa (EXTERNAL:fanf2) id 1aRpBL-0002b1-h1 (Exim 4.86_36-e07b163) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:48:51 +0000
Received: from fanf2 by hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk (hermes.cam.ac.uk) with local id 1aRpBL-0006qM-A8 (Exim 4.72) (return-path <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>); Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:48:51 +0000
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:48:51 +0000
From: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>
X-X-Sender: fanf2@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160205224214.E32A1419B60F@rock.dv.isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1602052245570.21333@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1602052158390.7000@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> <20160205224214.E32A1419B60F@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LSU 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: Tony Finch <fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YIWVELQ6iQTtiWNNVVzDUZTqjkU>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] draft-ietf-dnsop-refuse-any and QTYPE=RRSIG
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:48:59 -0000

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> In message <alpine.LSU.2.00.1602052158390.7000@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>, Tony Fi
> nch writes:
> >
> > Would it be reasonable as an alternative to follow the refuse-any
> > approach and just return the RRSIG(s) for one RRset? If so, I think
> > this suggestion should be included in the draft.
>
> Yes, for both SIG and RRSIG.

Thanks :-)

Tony.
-- 
f.anthony.n.finch  <dot@dotat.at>  http://dotat.at/
South Biscay: Southerly veering southwesterly 5 to 7, occasionally gale 8.
Moderate or rough, occasionally very rough later in northwest. Rain later.
Good, occasionally poor later.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email