Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-00.txt

Ondřej Surý <ondrej@isc.org> Sat, 24 March 2018 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ondrej@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3E412D7F6 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3R9kXg7OpDiI for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE641200C1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 13:20:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12CC93AB05D; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:20:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE0F0160052; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:20:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985F9160070; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:20:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id q03zQpqcqou8; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:20:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.10.0.181] (40.20.broadband5.iol.cz [88.100.20.40]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B422C160052; Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:20:09 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
From: =?utf-8?B?T25kxZllaiBTdXLDvQ==?= <ondrej@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B5F0AAC-76CE-4A88-900D-2CA99993A9B6@rfc1035.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 21:20:06 +0100
Cc: "jabley@hopcount.ca" <jabley@hopcount.ca>, dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DBC4885A-941F-492B-8C19-45BB76E2D131@isc.org>
References: <152180695934.17546.2068402636242578841.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9CEA4F8F-4E71-4508-A088-103DD58F88E1@isc.org> <CA+nkc8DhXEEhiDqwHuA-_zNQc0n=rTZ-VZ6X8-0w-tY_0SC0eA@mail.gmail.com> <40ABB9EB-58EC-48FF-8117-60EE0E7006EF@isc.org> <CA+nkc8BfMKRUHuW+3EzOCeZHfmu1jeOgfVcszTbTYh9k2VTBcA@mail.gmail.com> <002DCABB-24CE-42FA-8DA6-2A458E5F89A1@isc.org> <5AB53F8B.9070504@redbarn.org> <7CF21F70-9419-4D6A-B555-FC229F90E8A9@isc.org> <5AB546CB.3030408@redbarn.org> <CCAE4014-67F8-4E73-A893-AA06B83E880B@isc.org> <20180324124958.GA29255@puck.nether.net> <CAJhMdTPRn=mUQ6xh_HFdFLBk109b_M2+saS86KFxsttb8_oVvw@mail.gmail.com> <4B5F0AAC-76CE-4A88-900D-2CA99993A9B6@rfc1035.com>
To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YLLnLF74AFGJhvTFdKHC3_Rkblg>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] New Version Notification for draft-sury-deprecate-obsolete-resource-records-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 20:20:12 -0000

> It might be a different story if one of those zombie RRtypes required additional processing. None spring to mind though.

But (most of) those I picked actually *DO*:

a) compression is allowed, so compliant and non-compliant servers can’t speak together, because non-compliant will just store junk in the RDATA when received from compliant server;
b) the RDATA needs to be understood and lowercased for canonical form when DNSSEC signing; again you need to *implement* this in DNSSEC Validator as it would cause validation failures if you don't

And all this extra work must be done for RR Types that are unused in current protocols. The implementation for these M* types isn’t just wire<->human readable translation.

Ondrej
--
Ondřej Surý
ondrej@isc.org