IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?

George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org> Wed, 23 December 2015 05:20 UTC

Return-Path: <ggm@algebras.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B571AC436 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:20:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1v_uF-B4mnt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:20:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x236.google.com (mail-qg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099D11AC430 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:20:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-x236.google.com with SMTP id 74so78962655qgh.1 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:20:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9YcAAJe2KDfyUhJD1+SRMBx0EcIEwFuddPyCStbRMCU=; b=gUZ7kIOtadVDC83efc0UuLadTKYDl3Da8BN924xqPp6L3+LDoPttCxJFcC2hlvYi5u wMqlFyZUxQyg+VATT6O3m5xOz1VpVo2O+MbvlEpAut3fXa87+I9OaRcVZQn7Nem8fHwn 8Ey0d+K8dEd/4MDY9v2o677gbcYzu0BLjS/WF3TV0PWLLilVxO3M0Ju2I5g6N30rAW2L NLrqhZtjTl206fD/OZHmiaw8qKcxfJ2cI2DxcWQDmowY3auoCrFIXV2GPKHkGAgRs+4A 3xlQi6+c8zflb+yaXN0jX5R0/2FzQEq12+KqLuxGUZGlN8vwTJJhC91keoI/XCu5wC/T Ycvw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9YcAAJe2KDfyUhJD1+SRMBx0EcIEwFuddPyCStbRMCU=; b=NYWxXYGujKc+cYE8US5r99fc/XzIP+h5567Xk2Jsde6y5w3GjLECceABfAgVmPrC1b Grw9FIH2rt0yo3lJw/IE2PHGuBgw/ji/EJ9Eu6flBnCfAVFmbuwXBEfGJoLMXx8E8+T2 R5PC15vU919HWI0CqTYqS4L3hx32rOll3I+/e/LecTbWJcZJvqv782wUVWO22YoPoMKk kSl689xxIfefL/3NyHfsVdjp8t3JieNOlYfqTKQtX4lOuGpEQ0tosFDg4SbNT1tgCAdI QEBA/1hv+B0iG0L/aNb0m2xB2aIV461cTgW/We6X4yURunqXQSTbVNtIUUJp/Sj3UHje iRVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3J1Ql/AQ0vTvU5+/1Ch8gHcN4SLUbyWGB+bdgfyWtuVoTrCQvkaPzoYqv1ZkqQt4icpbKaszEz8hq8uIN9bDejf2qjQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.102.35 with SMTP id v32mr37852070qge.72.1450848005250; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:20:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.55.103.214 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2015 21:20:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:dc0:a000:4:dce6:64b9:baaa:4b48]
In-Reply-To: <3040894.aPaWt5ExKr@linux-85bq.suse>
References: <20151217020754.6915b71c@pallas.home.time-travellers.org> <4909572.yk9lYxXkhq@linux-85bq.suse> <CAKr6gn2yNB-S7Uk=Sx_=iHUUFQDqRxhrVznRP3GNswkyWvBgxw@mail.gmail.com> <3040894.aPaWt5ExKr@linux-85bq.suse>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 15:20:05 +1000
Message-ID: <CAKr6gn2koTJ=vr5nZLhPnREMqAST8RLgJKPmOfLEouHNJgovWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie@tisf.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1134f088f9f6f8052789df54"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YN0Do93avJ-saiSFoA1n9v4Fhuc>
Cc: dnsop WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Should we try to work on DNS over HTTP in dnsop?
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 05:20:07 -0000

I think the REST/JSON conversation is worth having too! Didn't Jay Daley
submit some ideas on that a while back?

-G

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Paul Vixie <vixie@tisf.net> wrote:

> On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 03:13:04 PM George Michaelson wrote:
>
> > I'd be interested in the cache effects. If the TTL is mapped into cache
>
> > age, then there is potential for CDN distribution to work more better
>
> > gooder.
>
>
>
> for that, you need a RESTful/JSON interface. the method+URI is a cache key.
>
>
>
> --
>
> P. Vixie
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email