IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-dnsop-error-page-00.txt

tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> Thu, 09 July 2020 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <kondtir@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F2C3A0881 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 00:46:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pxPZlJ2CRZ6O for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 00:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2e.google.com (mail-io1-xd2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227433A087B for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 00:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2e.google.com with SMTP id i4so1311012iov.11 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:46:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4eRapeBvhh8EVkZ5WCS9EzwYkEIC95dNLU/dkz+/EoA=; b=Z5Rkc8lhAiM6QoLdLZ5sNmzPj6xszXcQDkIImasxyHQp7e4VVeHYueCfC2jAevJApG lCwsHfvuqN32Tq3aj27FSt8lSPhB+N5sxG9J0XVbXnH+p1NjkwSaf8fJFuu8QSl3MkW1 W7iLDx/FfUFOLx8ISm33OmEnoCv7lkoWk31fHwdrafxPh8T0tX2ZYOkLVqZ5goQnvVn4 jqsY0rpvW5viUwePzy1UAmSupJ7kvRpPRPZrlz1T3q5UjIToLCZwNUPV0XzikgM/pS8x jPG2FRk67m3ytiIPiVA7z93f3QAt+iiaT6p4YA+MgA1wXncY0wT+w7eT5asaaRMdXJnw H66Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4eRapeBvhh8EVkZ5WCS9EzwYkEIC95dNLU/dkz+/EoA=; b=QyfWbJZcC/aWBUILyaOOg8utB3/qMFArgcVUqPOougNktjxxqZRTSyaI19/oEwhOAM vCh+SOn0Cbm8csPzf2CYTio697L9HfVCYhqTa47YvUXkNp5W4N69UfslwFd7wnIXb7zK ndiqneh8AApR6XG+DAiUe6CRWJ9XF3JBKJZNabJjTIqoC5Vjc+M0hNazuVb0L1+SiaAF 41Op60U3X2AwqqqxC+JcpV42xBs2d17EpaZfpuF6eQqZ6gbA5MC07msaznVmt7d38YEh 7G8UJnfetpTGUFzlJFKFBdadnJ7lyMWSUchtInuaC+MNEtexGJAnj+LPtjloXZM/TyIA 6/zw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lRK13WiYlvitWWodVyd1H47iHiZ3cmVEl39dNhO66BaTiYEHy QGQo+smwWGPGg/DTByKSQFWRk+/SMexhr9D/7fsBKEN6
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyaybmo50aUgMQ+2Zoz1qs0QqYX/AV30vY3Gu342aWTITXE6yqdspAfLt7YxOE/w3KXRTj1DvsHsdN2lBmD7Jg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:5b83:: with SMTP id g125mr70607037jab.91.1594280802299; Thu, 09 Jul 2020 00:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159419312721.4560.7461331648236111056@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAFpG3gcKVHxQo0USq-K3-jYnVUULiHU=asBx4P8bFm0Rw6V42Q@mail.gmail.com> <1932065230.926.1594213116969@appsuite-dev-gw1.open-xchange.com> <CAFpG3gft=HFvqfmCHk29FWuwmdTj9sAZhosHgjQib6c_BSXQeA@mail.gmail.com> <710326065.1495.1594279350018@appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <710326065.1495.1594279350018@appsuite-dev-gw2.open-xchange.com>
From: tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 13:16:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CAFpG3gcjG-cTK33=FvWYttO+HUhfD092hMb=ybcRBeh98NbK7Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com>
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4b29605a9fd6cab"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YNuEv_81pcWvSeJGXRsnifqog5A>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-reddy-dnsop-error-page-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 07:46:45 -0000

On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 at 12:52, Vittorio Bertola <
vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com> wrote:

>
> Il 09/07/2020 08:53 tirumal reddy <kondtir@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> Regarding section 4, in DPRIVE (on draft bcp-op) we have recently been
> told that the IETF does not recommend in its best practices anything which
> is not strictly technical (in that case, it was about communicating to
> users the jurisdiction under which DNS resolution is provided):
>
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dns-privacy/rJ7R3OBUyySfEyJgwhoxs1DNGuc/
>
> So I would assume that that section is out of scope as well, and I would
> remove it.
>
>
> My understanding is the "jurisdiction" is out of scope but not RPS (see
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-12#section-6)
>
> Sure, those three points were agreed with Alissa as the scope of any
> statement that might be described in the best practice:
>
>    o  Relates _only_ to matters around to the technical operation of DNS
>       privacy services, and not on any other matters.
>
>    o  Does not attempt to offer an exhaustive list for the contents of
>       an RPS.
>
>    o  Is not intended to form the basis of any legal/compliance
>       documentation.
>
> So I would take that as guidance here as well: I don't think we can say
> whether it should contain regulatory information, redress measures etc.
> (though that would indeed be advisable).
>

Yes, I agree; will update the section to say:

   The content of the error page is non-normative, the above text only
   provides the guidelines and template for the error page and.

   o  Does not attempt to offer an exhaustive list for the contents of
      an error page.

   o  It is not intended to form the basis of any legal/compliance for
      developing the error page.

Cheers,
-Tiru

Also, in Italy the ISP, when blocking websites by court order, is required
> to show a page which is exactly defined by law and by the public authority
> that "seized" the website (e.g.
> https://www.startmag.it/wp-content/uploads/butac.png ) - it is not
> allowed to change it in any way. I would expect that to happen in other
> countries as well.
>
> --
>
> Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
> vittorio.bertola@open-xchange.com
> Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email