IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC1035 (6601)

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Tue, 08 June 2021 02:15 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD873A1C5C for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:15:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=nzNjQNaH; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isc.org header.b=fNQh61fX
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DzdmHMwWJaBu for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.pao1.isc.org (mx.pao1.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:0:2::2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1685A3A1C5A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2021 19:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx.pao1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 127843AB023; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:14:53 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=isc.org; s=ostpay; t=1623118493; bh=83ClryEzZ8v/nx/e30fE587gbr547vBHSZEbFLcLFho=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=nzNjQNaH8pOxmvjAYk6YPZu6JOHxfYx8P31No3Cmr1fqgO7YLRp2cXcW/sz3ct5hp 7N8xcl1JNe7n/m1rr9iJXl7rhrlppL2r4L2eLKH3l5qz8iQgsbAnBV30RJ/1UMb3Bc qK+xabxCSEePJFVngF5k8xlEqiaSqAHXSyMFqdrk=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE71A160047; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B21916005C; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 zmx1.isc.org 6B21916005C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=isc.org; s=05DFB016-56A2-11EB-AEC0-15368D323330; t=1623118492; bh=A7X5+UNrcdnsihUUejClYyge4Tc/v19Ejetu1QbcUag=; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:To; b=fNQh61fXbWFAl2C5jZZEKRH0ipdljGyJzTZQomp2/2ScxoEcDELbNkJ2x/HMY0KXu 7H13sfnm2XBdGH2VVuGUGIvmmHoztlQFnbX5duE5qACDvlAO6UAZGB8Dr0FjIz8YfF AJKq8p4afzJ9bHk2jZkuERsnZiOunYhYinf8QOag=
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id z5vmuqff2yRT; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:14:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (n49-177-132-25.bla3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [49.177.132.25]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8444E160047; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 02:14:51 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHw9_i+0PX5SwaC=_m2rLQKfd91G08i5qwA-2ZE_UA+pWwT6BA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 12:14:49 +1000
Cc: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <763FC093-FAC3-4232-98CB-D200D324390E@isc.org>
References: <20210607045647.B9E60F4084C@rfc-editor.org> <CAHw9_i+0PX5SwaC=_m2rLQKfd91G08i5qwA-2ZE_UA+pWwT6BA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YNzUcmJvbgkUDufTztV0j-pj0rs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC1035 (6601)
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 02:15:02 -0000

While there is nothing wrong with the change it isn’t actually a
errata as it is referring the reader back to section 6.1.3 where
both forms where discussed together.


> On 8 Jun 2021, at 06:20, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I believe that this Errata should be marked as Verified; does anyone disagree?
> 
> Please let me know by Friday if you disagree,
> W
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> Date: Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 12:57 AM
> Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC1035 (6601)
> To: <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: <patrick.ni@redant.ca>, <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
> 
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC1035,
> "Domain names - implementation and specification".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6601
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Patrick Ni <patrick.ni@redant.ca>
> 
> Section: 7.1
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> This timestamp uses the absolute time format previously discussed for RR storage in zones and caches
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> This timestamp uses the absolute time format previously discussed for RR storage in caches
> 
> Notes
> -----
> In section 6.1.3. Time, it says "while data in the zone stays with constant TTL ... The RRs in zones use relative times; the refresh timers and cache data use absolute times"
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC1035 (no draft string recorded)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Domain names - implementation and specification
> Publication Date    : November 1987
> Author(s)           : P.V. Mockapetris
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : Legacy
> Area                : Legacy
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> The computing scientist’s main challenge is not to get confused by the
> complexities of his own making. 
>   -- E. W. Dijkstra
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742              INTERNET: marka@isc.org

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status