IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dnsop-any-notimp-00.txt

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Sun, 08 March 2015 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B501A86DD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 05:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JQtyZTcwv78B for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 05:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 474C21A854D for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 05:46:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.31.9.95] (unknown [123.126.24.150]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12495184D7; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 12:46:09 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <54FC4489.8050506@redbarn.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 05:46:01 -0700
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Finch <fanf2@cam.ac.uk>
References: <20150306172715.24305.58649.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAN6NTqw4n_mTqjGDsOc4kT3fvm1PaCWKt+AUPw+4GevQqG3Ymw@mail.gmail.com> <20150306182444.GA50555@PorcupineTree.nominum.com> <54F9FC8D.9050003@redbarn.org> <20150306213856.GA51222@PorcupineTree.nominum.com> <54FA2179.3000403@redbarn.org> <20150306223336.GA60793@PorcupineTree.nominum.com> <54FA2FEE.7000304@redbarn.org> <C5299BB5-46A8-4B36-9446-0725A8FB68DA@cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <C5299BB5-46A8-4B36-9446-0725A8FB68DA@cam.ac.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YR5KV1B3ihCv0bXrPFa1qTHs7Uw>
Cc: Olafur Gudmundsson <olafur@cloudflare.com>, "dnsop@ietf.org" <dnsop@ietf.org>, Ralf Weber <dns@fl1ger.de>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dnsop-any-notimp-00.txt
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 12:46:13 -0000


Tony Finch wrote:
>
> On 6 Mar 2015, at 22:53, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:
>
>>>> if you want to change how DNSSEC works, i'll listen. ...
>>> ... implementing RRSIG
>>> is as hard as implementing ANY with regard to the aspect that you have
>>> to use/look for more than one query type, which is different from
>>> all other query types.
>>
>> i see. so, are you proposing to change the way DNSSEC works, or not?
> I think Ralf is right that QTYPE=RRSIG is weird just like ANY, in that
it is asking for (part of) all? any? RRsets at a given owner name. I
wonder how caches handle it...
> Since DNSSEC does not use or need QTYPE=RRSIG, I do not see how
deprecating it would require any changes to DNSSEC.

ok, i'm convinced. (olafur, please note?)

-- 
Paul Vixie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email