Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Mon, 04 August 2014 08:24 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F3A1B28B2 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 01:24:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bq_k_bBT6xdD for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 01:24:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897A61B28AE for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 01:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 3443E3BA89; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:24:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by tyrion (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 28189F02EB2; Mon, 4 Aug 2014 10:19:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 10:19:58 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140804081958.GA30123@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org>
References: <20140721195651.7856.qmail@joyce.lan> <53D47214.8060204@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <53D47214.8060204@gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/YSVUcdEaQWBMJI2peJWNNT-12Hk
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 08:24:23 -0000

On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 11:29:24PM -0400,
 Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 49 lines which said:

> So I'm going to do something different:  I will submit this document

"this" being, I assume, the version on Github? It is modified
non-trivially since the last formally published version (-04) so I
prefer to check.

> 	https://github.com/DNSOP/dnssec-key-timing

The draft on Github is named -04 while it is actually quite different
from the published -04, beware.

> This is slightly non-standard, but we've been down this road and this
> one is ready.

So you will submit to the IESG a version which has not been published
as an I-D? Or will it be published in the next days?

I mentioned in Toronto my concerns about showing the creation of the
two keys at the same time, and about the whole concept of Tgen (key
generation time). In my opinion, the changes since -04 address these
concerns so I'm happy with the current Github version.

The timelines are now much better, but a consequence of these changes
is that Tgen is now defined but not used. Not a problem for me.